Cited by 821Image Enhancement TechniquesGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisImage and Signal Denoising Methods

Attentive Generative Adversarial Network for Raindrop Removal from A Single Image

Open access
Qian, Rui, Tan, Robby T., Yang, Wenhan, Su, Jiajun, Liu, Jiaying·2018·2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

Raindrops adhered to a glass window or camera lens can severely hamper the visibility of a background scene and degrade an image considerably. In this paper, we address the problem by visually removing raindrops, and thus transforming a raindrop degraded image into a clean one. The problem is intractable, since first the regions occluded by raindrops are not given. Second, the information about the background scene of the occluded regions is completely lost for most part. To resolve the problem, we apply an attentive generative network using adversarial training. Our main idea is to inject visual attention into both the generative and discriminative networks. During the training, our visual attention learns about raindrop regions and their surroundings. Hence, by injecting this information, the generative network will pay more attention to the raindrop regions and the surrounding structures, and the discriminative network will be able to assess the local consistency of the restored regions. This injection of visual attention to both generative and discriminative networks is the main contribution of this paper. Our experiments show the effectiveness of our approach, which outperforms the state of the art methods quantitatively and qualitatively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00263

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Results show improvements in system performance with the help of attention maps (A + AD vs. A + D and A).

    “Results also show the improvements in system performance with the help of attention maps (A + AD vs. A + D and A), where”
  • Qian et al. proposed a raindrop removal algorithm based on an attentive Generative Adversarial Network, named DeRaindrop.

    “Qian et al. [49] proposed a raindrop removal algorithm, based on an attentive Generative Adversarial Network (GAN). Their implementation of this algorithm is named “DeRaindrop””
  • The proposed system outperformed the other systems in terms of PSNR and SSIM.

    “The proposed system outperformed the other systems, both in terms of PSNR and SSIM (Structure SIMilarity index).”
  • Using the Qian et al. [49] dataset for training and testing, both Attentive GAN [49] and Kim et al.'s proposed algorithm improved PSNR and SSIM scores of restored images versus distorted images.

    “Using Qian et al. [49] dataset for training and testing showed that both attentive GAN [49] and Kim et al. proposed algorithm improved quantitative score of PSNR and SSIM of restored image versus distorted one.”
  • Qualitatively, Hoa et al.'s proposed algorithm, as well as Qian's and DID-MDN, removed most raindrops successfully.

    “Qualitatively, the proposed algorithm, as well as Qian’s and the DIID-MDN removed most raindrops successfully.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qian, R., Tan, R. T., Yang, W., Su, J., & Liu, J.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Yale-NUS College (SG)
Venue
2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-06
Pages
2482-2491
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963800716
Cited by
821
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 118 · 2024: 118 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 129 · 2021: 133 · 2020: 101 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 10
FWCI
22.23
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • Nvidia
  • Yale-NUS College
  • Tencent
  • National Research Foundation
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61772043)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Enhancement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
Keywords
raindrop removal, image restoration, generative adversarial networks, visual attention, occlusion, image denoising, adversarial training, image inpainting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review