Cited by 916Emotion and Mood RecognitionFace recognition and analysisFace and Expression Recognition

Occlusion Aware Facial Expression Recognition Using CNN With Attention Mechanism

Li, Yong, Zeng, Jiabei, Shan, Shiguang, Chen, Xilin·2019·IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

Abstract

Facial expression recognition in the wild is challenging due to various un-constrained conditions. Although existing facial expression classifiers have been almost perfect on analyzing constrained frontal faces, they fail to perform well on partially occluded faces that are common in the wild. In this paper, we propose a Convolution Neutral Network with attention mechanism (ACNN) that can perceive the occlusion regions of the face and focus on the most discriminative unoccluded regions. ACNN is an end to end learning framework. It combines the multiple representations from facial regions of interest (ROIs). Each representation is weighed via a proposed Gate Unit that computes an adaptive weight from the region itself according to the unobstructed-ness and importance. Considering different RoIs, we introduce two versions of ACNN: patch based ACNN (pACNN) and global-local based ACNN (gACNN). pACNN only pays attention to local facial patches. gACNN integrates local representations at patch-level with global representation at image-level. The proposed ACNNs are evaluated on both real and synthetic occlusions, including a self-collected facial expression dataset with real-world occlusions (FED-RO), two largest in-the-wild facial expression datasets (RAF-DB and AffectNet) and their modifications with synthesized facial occlusions. Experimental results show that ACNNs improve the recognition accuracy on both the non-occluded faces and occluded faces. Visualization results demonstrate that, compared with the CNN without Gate Unit, ACNNs are capable of shifting the attention from the occluded patches to other related but unobstructed ones. ACNNs also outperform other state-of-the-art methods on several widely used in-the-lab facial expression datasets under the cross-dataset evaluation protocol.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tip.2018.2886767

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SAFER outperforms results from [19] and [21] on the FER-2013 dataset.

    “In FER-2013 dataset (table 7), our model outperforms results from [19] and [21].”

    From SAFER: Situation Aware Facial Emotion Recognition (2023) · cites this paper as [21]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Y., Zeng, J., Shan, S., & Chen, X.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Published
2019-05
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
2439-2450
ISSN
  • 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0042
OpenAlex
W2904483377
Cited by
916
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 112 · 2024: 143 · 2023: 179 · 2022: 159 · 2021: 154 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 35
FWCI
87.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFB1002802)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61702481, 61702486)
  • External Cooperation Program of CAS (GJHZ1843)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
Keywords
facial expression recognition, occlusion, attention mechanism, region of interest, in-the-wild faces, RAF-DB, AffectNet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review