Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 563

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Harmonic Networks: Deep Translation and Rotation Equivariance

Worrall, Daniel E., Garbin, Stephan J., Turmukhambetov, Daniyar, Brostow, Gabriel J.·2017·2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Translating or rotating an input image should not affect the results of many computer vision tasks. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are already translation equivariant: input image translations produce proportionate feature map translations. This is not the case for rotations. Global rotation equivariance is typically sought through data augmentation, but patch-wise equivariance is more difficult. We present Harmonic Networks or H-Nets, a CNN exhibiting equivariance to patch-wise translation and 360-rotation. We achieve this by replacing regular CNN filters with circular harmonics, returning a maximal response and orientation for every receptive field patch. H-Nets use a rich, parameter-efficient and fixed computational complexity representation, and we show that deep feature maps within the network encode complicated rotational invariants. We demonstrate that our layers are general enough to be used in conjunction with the latest architectures and techniques, such as deep supervision and batch normalization. We also achieve state-of-the-art classification on rotated-MNIST, and competitive results on other benchmark challenges.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2017.758

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1109/ICCV.2015.164 · DOI · Paper page
  2. sohn, 2012, Learning invariant representations with local transformations, Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning 2012
  3. 10.1109/ICCV.2009.5459468 · DOI
  4. zeiler, 2014, Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks, Computer Vision — ECCV 2014 — 13th European Conference Zurich Switzerland September 6–12 2014 Proceedings, 818
  5. hwang, 2015, Pixel-wise deep learning for contour detection, abs 1504 1989
  6. jacobsen, 2016, Structured receptive fields in cnns, abs 1605 2971
  7. kivinen, 2014, Visual boundary prediction: A deep neural prediction network and quality dissection, Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics AISTATS 2014, 512
  8. kokkinos, 2015, Pushing the boundaries of boundary detection using deep learning
  9. laptev, 2016, TI-POOLING transformation-invariant pooling for feature learning in convolutional neural networks, abs 1604 6318
  10. 10.1145/1273496.1273556 · DOI · Paper page
  11. lecun, 1989, Handwritten digit recognition with a back-propagation network, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2 [NIPS Conference, 396
  12. 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7299024 · DOI · Paper page
  13. cohen, 2016, Steerable cnns, abs 1612 8498
  14. 10.1109/CVPR.2012.6247909 · DOI
  15. cohen, 2016, Group equivariant convolutional networks
  16. 10.1109/ICPR.2006.1020 · DOI
  17. simonyan, 2014, Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-scale Image Recognition, abs 1409 1556
  18. dieleman, 2016, Exploiting cyclic symmetry in convolutional neural networks
  19. ganin, 2014, N4-fields Neural network nearest neighbor fields for image transforms, abs 1406 6558
  20. 10.1109/34.93808 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7299067 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1109/TPAMI.2010.161 · DOI · Paper page
  23. lee, 2015, Deeply-supervised nets, Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics AISTATS 2015
  24. lenc, 2016, Learning covariant feature detectors, abs 1605 1224
  25. 10.1109/ICPR.2016.7899932 · DOI
  26. liu, 2012, 2d/3d rotation-invariant detection using equivariant filters and kernel weighted mapping, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 917
  27. 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298904 · DOI
  28. 10.1162/neco.2010.01-09-953 · DOI

Cited by

See all 563

Metadata

Authors
Worrall, D. E., Garbin, S. J., Turmukhambetov, D., & Brostow, G. J.
Venue
2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-07
Pages
7168-7177
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2576915720
Cited by
563
References
6
FWCI
18.04
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Harmonic Networks: Deep Translation and Rotation Equivariance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2017.758
The paper
Worrall, D. E., Garbin, S. J., Turmukhambetov, D., & Brostow, G. J. (2017). Harmonic Networks: Deep Translation and Rotation Equivariance. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2017.758

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.