Cited by 205Advanced Vision and ImagingAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization

Single View Stereo Matching

Open access
Luo, Yue, Ren, Jimmy, Lin, Mude, Pang, Jiahao, Sun, Wenxiu, Li, Hongsheng, Lin, Liang·2018·2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

Previous monocular depth estimation methods take a single view and directly regress the expected results. Though recent advances are made by applying geometrically inspired loss functions during training, the inference procedure does not explicitly impose any geometrical constraint. Therefore these models purely rely on the quality of data and the effectiveness of learning to generalize. This either leads to suboptimal results or the demand of huge amount of expensive ground truth labelled data to generate reasonable results. In this paper, we show for the first time that the monocular depth estimation problem can be reformulated as two sub-problems, a view synthesis procedure followed by stereo matching, with two intriguing properties, namely i) geometrical constraints can be explicitly imposed during inference; ii) demand on labelled depth data can be greatly alleviated. We show that the whole pipeline can still be trained in an end-to-end fashion and this new formulation plays a critical role in advancing the performance. The resulting model outperforms all the previous monocular depth estimation methods as well as the stereo block matching method in the challenging KITTI dataset by only using a small number of real training data. The model also generalizes well to other monocular depth estimation benchmarks. We also discuss the implications and the advantages of solving monocular depth estimation using stereo methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00024

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The evaluation method introduced by Eigen [8] for KITTI uses reprojected LIDAR points but does not handle occlusions, moving objects, or the fact that the car is moving.

    “The evaluation method introduced by Eigen [8] for KITTI uses the reprojected LI-DAR points but does not handle occlusions, moving objects, or the fact that the car is moving.”

    From Digging Into Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimation (2019) · cites this paper as [8]

  • The improved ground truth depth is provided for 652 (or 93%) of the 697 test frames contained in the Eigen test split.

    “This improved ground truth depth is provided for 652 (or 93%) of the 697 test frames contained in the Eigen test split [8].”

    From Digging Into Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimation (2019) · cites this paper as [8]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luo, Y., Ren, J., Lin, M., Pang, J., Sun, W., Li, H., & Lin, L.
Affiliations
  • Sensetime (China) (CN)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Venue
2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-06
Pages
155-163
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964020152
Cited by
205
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 6
FWCI
9.34
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Keywords
monocular depth estimation, stereo matching, view synthesis, geometric constraints, end-to-end learning, KITTI dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review