Cited by 381Advanced Vision and ImagingImage Processing Techniques and ApplicationsRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization

Discrete-Continuous Depth Estimation from a Single Image

Liu, Miaomiao, Salzmann, Mathieu, He, Xuming·2014·2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

In this paper, we tackle the problem of estimating the depth of a scene from a single image. This is a challenging task, since a single image on its own does not provide any depth cue. To address this, we exploit the availability of a pool of images for which the depth is known. More specifically, we formulate monocular depth estimation as a discrete-continuous optimization problem, where the continuous variables encode the depth of the superpixels in the input image, and the discrete ones represent relationships between neighboring superpixels. The solution to this discrete-continuous optimization problem is then obtained by performing inference in a graphical model using particle belief propagation. The unary potentials in this graphical model are computed by making use of the images with known depth. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our model in both the indoor and outdoor scenarios. Our experimental evaluation shows that our depth estimates are more accurate than existing methods on standard datasets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2014.97

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ImageNet pretraining improves accuracy for the compact model compared to training from scratch.

    “Similar to [30,16], we start with weights pretrained on Ima-geNet [54], and show that this improves accuracy for our compact model compared to training from scratch (Table 2).”

    From Digging Into Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimation (2019) · cites this paper as [16]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, M., Salzmann, M., & He, X.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Venue
2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2014-06
Pages
716-723
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083047701
Cited by
381
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 2
FWCI
11.11
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Image Processing Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Keywords
monocular depth estimation, superpixels, discrete-continuous optimization, probabilistic graphical models, unary potentials, indoor and outdoor scenes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review