Cited by 193Image Enhancement TechniquesImage and Signal Denoising MethodsAdvanced Image Processing Techniques

Erase or Fill? Deep Joint Recurrent Rain Removal and Reconstruction in Videos

Liu, Jiaying, Yang, Wenhan, Yang, Shuai, Guo, Zongming·2018·2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

In this paper, we address the problem of video rain removal by constructing deep recurrent convolutional networks. We visit the rain removal case by considering rain occlusion regions, i.e. the light transmittance of rain streaks is low. Different from additive rain streaks, in such rain occlusion regions, the details of background images are completely lost. Therefore, we propose a hybrid rain model to depict both rain streaks and occlusions. With the wealth of temporal redundancy, we build a Joint Recurrent Rain Removal and Reconstruction Network (J4R-Net) that seamlessly integrates rain degradation classification, spatial texture appearances based rain removal and temporal coherence based background details reconstruction. The rain degradation classification provides a binary map that reveals whether a location is degraded by linear additive streaks or occlusions. With this side information, the gate of the recurrent unit learns to make a trade-off between rain streak removal and background details reconstruction. Extensive experiments on a series of synthetic and real videos with rain streaks verify the superiority of the proposed method over previous state-of-the-art methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00341

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For DR(eye)VE testing, Alletto et al.'s proposed algorithm outperformed Vid2Vid and a rain-streak removal algorithm in both PSNR and SSIM metrics.

    “Results again showed that the proposed algorithm overperformed the other algorithms, both in the PSNR and SSIM metrics.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, J., Yang, W., Yang, S., & Guo, Z.
Affiliations
Peking University (CN)
Venue
2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-06
Pages
3233-3242
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2798744505
Cited by
193
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 8
FWCI
7.99
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Enhancement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
Keywords
rain streaks, recurrent convolutional networks, temporal coherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review