Cited by 201Music and Audio ProcessingSpeech and Audio ProcessingSpeech Recognition and Synthesis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Visual to Sound: Generating Natural Sound for Videos in the Wild

Zhou, Yipin, Wang, Zhaowen, Fang, Chen, Bui, Trung, Berg, Tamara L.·2018·2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

As two of the five traditional human senses (sight, hearing, taste, smell, and touch), vision and sound are basic sources through which humans understand the world. Often correlated during natural events, these two modalities combine to jointly affect human perception. In this paper, we pose the task of generating sound given visual input. Such capabilities could help enable applications in virtual reality (generating sound for virtual scenes automatically) or provide additional accessibility to images or videos for people with visual impairments. As a first step in this direction, we apply learning-based methods to generate raw waveform samples given input video frames. We evaluate our models on a dataset of videos containing a variety of sounds (such as ambient sounds and sounds from people/animals). Our experiments show that the generated sounds are fairly realistic and have good temporal synchronization with the visual inputs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00374

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many works are using cross-modal deep generative models such as GAN in data synthesis, such as from video to audio, from text to image and vice versa.

    “If we take a broader view, many works are using cross-modal deep generative models (such as GAN) in data synthesis, such as from video to audio [267], from text to image and vice versa [268,269].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. aytar, 2016, Soundnet: Learning sound representations from unlabeled video, NIPS

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, Y., Wang, Z., Fang, C., Bui, T., & Berg, T. L.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Adobe Systems (United States) (US)
Venue
2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-06
Pages
3550-3558
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963807156
Cited by
201
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 6
FWCI
16.22
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Keywords
audio-video synchronization, waveform generation, environmental sounds, virtual reality audio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review