Cited by 330Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionAdvanced Neural Network Applications

MUREL: Multimodal Relational Reasoning for Visual Question Answering

Open access
Cadene, Remi, Ben-younes, Hedi, Cord, Matthieu, Thome, Nicolas·2019·2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Multimodal attentional networks are currently state-of-the-art models for Visual Question Answering (VQA) tasks involving real images. Although attention allows to focus on the visual content relevant to the question, this simple mechanism is arguably insufficient to model complex reasoning features required for VQA or other high-level tasks. In this paper, we propose MuRel, a multimodal relational network which is learned end-to-end to reason over real images. Our first contribution is the introduction of the MuRel cell, an atomic reasoning primitive representing interactions between question and image regions by a rich vectorial representation, and modeling region relations with pairwise combinations. Secondly, we incorporate the cell into a full MuRel network, which progressively refines visual and question interactions, and can be leveraged to define visualization schemes finer than mere attention maps. We validate the relevance of our approach with various ablation studies, and show its superiority to attention-based methods on three datasets: VQA 2.0, VQA-CP v2 and TDIUC. Our final MuRel network is competitive to or outperforms state-of-the-art results in this challenging context. Our code is available: github.com/Cadene/murel.bootstrap.pytorch

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2019.00209

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most common existing VQA methods use attention and memory mechanisms to learn visual artifacts and the semantic correlations needed to answer questions accurately.

    “Currently, the most common existing methods use attention [125, 127, 129] and memory [126] mechanisms to efficiently learn visual artifacts and the semantic correlations that allow questions to be answered accurately.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. A. Agrawal, D. Batra, D. Parikh, and A. Kembhavi. Dont just assume; look and answer: Overcoming pri- ors for visual question answering. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4971-4980, 2018. 5
  2. Y. Bai, J. Fu, T. Zhao, and T. Mei. Deep atten- tion neural tensor network for visual question answer- ing. In The European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), September 2018. 7
  3. D. A. Hudson and C. D. Manning. Compositional at- tention networks for machine reasoning. In Interna- tional Conference on Learning Representations, 2018. 2, 3
  4. A. Santoro, D. Raposo, D. G. T. Barrett, M. Mali- nowski, R. Pascanu, P. Battaglia, and T. Lillicrap. A simple neural network module for relational reason- ing. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Conference on Neural Informa- tion Processing Systems 2017, 4-9 December 2017, Long Beach, CA, USA, pages 4974-4983, 2017. 2

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cadene, R., Ben-younes, H., Cord, M., & Thome, N.
Affiliations
  • Sorbonne université
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Sorbonne Université (FR)
  • Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers (FR)
Venue
2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-06
Pages
1989-1998
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2916723116
Cited by
330
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 13
FWCI
17.52
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-16-CE23-0006)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
visual question answering, relational networks, attentional networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review