Cited by 623Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

Bounding Box Regression With Uncertainty for Accurate Object Detection

Open access
He, Yihui, Zhu, Chenchen, Wang, Jianren, Savvides, Marios, Zhang, Xiangyu·2019·2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Large-scale object detection datasets (e.g., MS-COCO) try to define the ground truth bounding boxes as clear as possible. However, we observe that ambiguities are still introduced when labeling the bounding boxes. In this paper, we propose a novel bounding box regression loss for learning bounding box transformation and localization variance together. Our loss greatly improves the localization accuracies of various architectures with nearly no additional computation. The learned localization variance allows us to merge neighboring bounding boxes during non-maximum suppression (NMS), which further improves the localization performance. On MS-COCO, we boost the Average Precision (AP) of VGG-16 Faster R-CNN from 23.6% to 29.1%. More importantly, for ResNet-50-FPN Mask R-CNN, our method improves the AP and AP90 by 1.8% and 6.2% respectively, which significantly outperforms previous state-of-the-art bounding box refinement methods. Our code and models are available at github.com/yihui-he/KL-Loss.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2019.00300

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many works have been proposed to solve the problems of greedy selection.

    “Many works have been proposed to solve the problems mentioned above [107, 112, 114, 115].”

    From Object Detection in 20 Years: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [114]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
He, Y., Zhu, C., Wang, J., Savvides, M., & Zhang, X.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Megvii (China) (CN)
Venue
2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-06
Pages
2883-2892
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2962677013
Cited by
623
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 1
FWCI
27.48
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
bounding box regression, uncertainty estimation, object detection, non-maximum suppression, bounding box refinement, Mask R-CNN, Faster R-CNN

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review