The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FBNetV2: Differentiable Neural Architecture Search for Spatial and Channel Dimensions
Open accessAbstract
Differentiable Neural Architecture Search (DNAS) has demonstrated great success in designing state-of-the-art, efficient neural networks. However, DARTS-based DNAS's search space is small when compared to other search methods', since all candidate network layers must be explicitly instantiated in memory. To address this bottleneck, we propose a memory and computationally efficient DNAS variant: DMaskingNAS. This algorithm expands the search space by up to 10^14x over conventional DNAS, supporting searches over spatial and channel dimensions that are otherwise prohibitively expensive: input resolution and number of filters. We propose a masking mechanism for feature map reuse, so that memory and computational costs stay nearly constant as the search space expands. Furthermore, we employ effective shape propagation to maximize per-FLOP or per-parameter accuracy. The searched FBNetV2s yield state-of-the-art performance when compared with all previous architectures. With up to 421x less search cost, DMaskingNAS finds models with 0.9% higher accuracy, 15% fewer FLOPs than MobileNetV3-Small; and with similar accuracy but 20% fewer FLOPs than Efficient-B0. Furthermore, our FBNetV2 outperforms MobileNetV3 by 2.6% in accuracy, with equivalent model size. FBNetV2 models are open-sourced at https://github.com/facebookresearch/mobile-vision.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Densely Connected Convolutional Networks
Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.243 · Cited by 48,566
Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks
Hu, J., Shen, L., & Sun, G. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00745 · Cited by 35,667
EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks
Tan, M., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.11946 · Cited by 17,072
Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks
Hu, J., Shen, L., Albanie, S., Sun, G., & Wu, E. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2019.2913372 · Cited by 12,157
Howard, A., Sandler, M., Chen, B., Wang, W., Chen, L.-C., Tan, M., Chu, G., Vasudevan, V., Zhu, Y., Pang, R., et al. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00140 · Cited by 9,708
ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Design
Ma, N., Zhang, X., Zheng, H.-T., & Sun, J. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01264-9_8 · Cited by 7,356 · cited 2×
“compressing existing networks [7] or building small networks [23, 26].”
BackgroundMethodMnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobile
Tan, M., Chen, B., Pang, R., Vasudevan, V., Sandler, M., Howard, A., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00293 · Cited by 3,416
Cited by
ResNeSt: Split-Attention Networks
Zhang, H., Wu, C., Zhang, Z., Zhu, Y., Lin, H., Zhang, Z., Sun, Y., He, T., Mueller, J., Manmatha, R., et al. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw56347.2022.00309 · Cited by 1,648
Review of Image Classification Algorithms Based on Convolutional Neural Networks
Chen, L., Li, S., Bai, Q., Yang, J., Jiang, S., & Miao, Y. (2021) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs13224712 · Cited by 789
Banbury, C., Zhou, C., Fedorov, I., Navarro, R. M., Thakker, U., Gope, D., Reddi, V. J., Mattina, M., & Whatmough, P. N. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.11267 · Cited by 183
HW-NAS-Bench:Hardware-Aware Neural Architecture Search Benchmark
Li, C., Yu, Z., Fu, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Y., You, H., Yu, Q., Wang, Y., & Lin, Y. C. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.10584 · Cited by 88
On-device machine learning An algorithms and learning theory perspective
Dhar, S., Guo, J., Liu, J., Tripathi, S., Kurup, U., & Shah, M. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.00623 · Cited by 47
AttentiveNAS: Improving Neural Architecture Search via Attentive Sampling
Wang, D., Li, M., Gong, C., & Chandra, V. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.09011 · Cited by 10
Learning Versatile Convolution Filters for Efficient Visual Recognition
Han, K., Wang, Y., Xu, C., Xu, C., Wu, E., & Tao, D. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3114368 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Wan, A., Dai, X., Zhang, P., He, Z., Tian, Y., Xie, S., Wu, B., Yu, M., Xu, T., Chen, K., Vajda, P., & Gonzalez, J. E.
- Venue
- 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-06
- Pages
- 12962-12971
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3034609471
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 17.19
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.