Micronets: Neural network architectures for deploying tinyml applications on commodity microcontrollers
Open accessAbstract
Executing machine learning workloads locally on resource constrained microcontrollers (MCUs) promises to drastically expand the application space of IoT. However, so-called TinyML presents severe technical challenges, as deep neural network inference demands a large compute and memory budget. To address this challenge, neural architecture search (NAS) promises to help design accurate ML models that meet the tight MCU memory, latency and energy constraints. A key component of NAS algorithms is their latency/energy model, i.e., the mapping from a given neural network architecture to its inference latency/energy on an MCU. In this paper, we observe an intriguing property of NAS search spaces for MCU model design: on average, model latency varies linearly with model operation (op) count under a uniform prior over models in the search space. Exploiting this insight, we employ differentiable NAS (DNAS) to search for models with low memory usage and low op count, where op count is treated as a viable proxy to latency. Experimental results validate our methodology, yielding our MicroNet models, which we deploy on MCUs using Tensorflow Lite Micro, a standard open-source NN inference runtime widely used in the TinyML community. MicroNets demonstrate state-of-the-art results for all three TinyMLperf industry-standard benchmark tasks: visual wake words, audio keyword spotting, and anomaly detection. Models and training scripts can be found at github.com/ARM-software/ML-zoo.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Depthwise separable convolution blocks are efficient proxies for latency control on MCUs.
“We employ Depthwise Separable Convolution blocks as the fundamental building unit, as these are known to be efficient proxies for latency control on MCUs [14].”
From A cascade framework for on-device uncertainty-aware event detection on microcontrollers (2026) · cites this paper as [14]
Section 5.2.2 (p. 7) uses depthwise-separable blocks in an MCU-targeted backbone designed to meet latency constraints. But the Conclusion (p. 10) identifies operation count—not the blocks themselves—as the proxy for latency, and Section 3.2 (p. 4) notes that depthwise convolutions have higher latency per operation than ordinary 2D convolutions. The claim overstates what the paper says about the blocks' role in latency control. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe number of operations (OPS) and network channel sizes heavily influence performance on MCUs.
“Building on findings that the number of operations (OPS) and network channel sizes heavily influence performance on MCUs [14], we implement a targeted Neural Architecture Search (NAS) to identify efficient structures for the three cascade stages.”
From A cascade framework for on-device uncertainty-aware event detection on microcontrollers (2026) · cites this paper as [14]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · see citing works
TinySpeech: Attention Condensers for Deep Speech Recognition Neural Networks on Edge Devices
Wong, A., Famouri, M., Pavlova, M., & Surana, S. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.04245 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Banbury, C. R., Reddi, V. J., Lam, M., Fu, W., Fazel, A., Holleman, J., Huang, X., Hurtado, R., Kanter, D., Lokhmotov, A., et al. Benchmarking tinyml systems: Challenges and direction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.04821 , 2020. · arXiv
- Cai, H., Zhu, L., and Han, S. ProxylessNAS: Direct neural architecture search on target task and hardware. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2019. URL https://arxiv.org/pdf/ 1812.00332.pdf .
- Capotondi, A., Rusci, M., Fariselli, M., and Benini, L. Cmix-nn: Mixed low-precision cnn library for memoryconstrained edge devices. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs , 67(5):871-875, 2020.
- Cheng, H.-P., Zhang, T., Yang, Y., Yan, F., Teague, H., Chen, Y., and Li, H. Msnet: Structural wired neural architecture search for internet of things. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops , pp. 0-0, 2019.
- Choi, S., Seo, S., Shin, B., Byun, H., Kersner, M., Kim, B., Kim, D., and Ha, S. Temporal convolution for real-time keyword spotting on mobile devices. CoRR , abs/1904.03814, 2019. URL http://arxiv.org/ abs/1904.03814 . · arXiv
- Chowdhery, A., Warden, P., Shlens, J., Howard, A., and Rhodes, R. Visual wake words dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.05721 , 2019. · arXiv
- David, R., Duke, J., Jain, A., Reddi, V. J., Jeffries, N., Li, J., Kreeger, N., Nappier, I., Natraj, M., Regev, S., et al. Tensorflow lite micro: Embedded machine learning on tinyml systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.08678 , 2020. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
TinyOL: TinyML with Online-Learning on Microcontrollers
Ren, H., Anicic, D., & Runkler, T. A. (2021) · 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn52387.2021.9533927 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Neural Architecture Search Survey: A Hardware Perspective
Chitty-Venkata, K. T., & Somani, A. K. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3524500 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
An Evolving TinyML Compression Algorithm for IoT Environments Based on Data Eccentricity
Signoretti, G., Silva, M., Andrade, P., Silva, I., Sisinni, E., & Ferrari, P. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21124153 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Giordano, M., Baumann, N., Crabolu, M., Fischer, R., Bellusci, G., & Magno, M. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2022.3165816 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Widening Access to Applied Machine Learning with TinyML
Janapa Reddi, V., Plancher, B., Kennedy, S., Moroney, L., Warden, P., Suzuki, L., Agarwal, A., Banbury, C., Banzi, M., Bennett, M., et al. (2022) · Harvard Data Science Review · doi:10.1162/99608f92.762d171a · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationA Generalization Performance Study Using Deep Learning Networks in Embedded Systems
Gorospe, J., Mulero, R., Arbelaitz, O., Muguerza, J., & Antón, M. Á. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21041031 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
TinyML in Africa: Opportunities and Challenges
Ooko, S. O., Muyonga Ogore, M., Nsenga, J., & Zennaro, M. (2021) · 2021 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps) · doi:10.1109/gcwkshps52748.2021.9682107 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Earthquake Detection with tinyML
Clements, T. (2023) · Seismological Research Letters · doi:10.1785/0220220322 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Banbury, C., Zhou, C., Fedorov, I., Navarro, R. M., Thakker, U., Gope, D., Reddi, V. J., Mattina, M., & Whatmough, P. N.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2010.11267
- OpenAlex
- W3094136258
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 32
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Keywords
- TinyML, neural architecture search, microcontroller, operation count, inference latency, energy modeling, TensorFlow Lite Micro, Internet of Things, anomaly detection, model compression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review