PreprintCited by 183Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingMachine Learning and Data Classification

Micronets: Neural network architectures for deploying tinyml applications on commodity microcontrollers

Open access
Banbury, Colby, Zhou, Chuteng, Fedorov, Igor, Navarro, Ramon Matas, Thakker, Urmish, Gope, Dibakar, Reddi, Vijay Janapa, Mattina, Matthew +1 more·2020·arXiv

Abstract

Executing machine learning workloads locally on resource constrained microcontrollers (MCUs) promises to drastically expand the application space of IoT. However, so-called TinyML presents severe technical challenges, as deep neural network inference demands a large compute and memory budget. To address this challenge, neural architecture search (NAS) promises to help design accurate ML models that meet the tight MCU memory, latency and energy constraints. A key component of NAS algorithms is their latency/energy model, i.e., the mapping from a given neural network architecture to its inference latency/energy on an MCU. In this paper, we observe an intriguing property of NAS search spaces for MCU model design: on average, model latency varies linearly with model operation (op) count under a uniform prior over models in the search space. Exploiting this insight, we employ differentiable NAS (DNAS) to search for models with low memory usage and low op count, where op count is treated as a viable proxy to latency. Experimental results validate our methodology, yielding our MicroNet models, which we deploy on MCUs using Tensorflow Lite Micro, a standard open-source NN inference runtime widely used in the TinyML community. MicroNets demonstrate state-of-the-art results for all three TinyMLperf industry-standard benchmark tasks: visual wake words, audio keyword spotting, and anomaly detection. Models and training scripts can be found at github.com/ARM-software/ML-zoo.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2010.11267

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Depthwise separable convolution blocks are efficient proxies for latency control on MCUs.

    “We employ Depthwise Separable Convolution blocks as the fundamental building unit, as these are known to be efficient proxies for latency control on MCUs [14].”

    From A cascade framework for on-device uncertainty-aware event detection on microcontrollers (2026) · cites this paper as [14]

    Section 5.2.2 (p. 7) uses depthwise-separable blocks in an MCU-targeted backbone designed to meet latency constraints. But the Conclusion (p. 10) identifies operation count—not the blocks themselves—as the proxy for latency, and Section 3.2 (p. 4) notes that depthwise convolutions have higher latency per operation than ordinary 2D convolutions. The claim overstates what the paper says about the blocks' role in latency control. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The number of operations (OPS) and network channel sizes heavily influence performance on MCUs.

    “Building on findings that the number of operations (OPS) and network channel sizes heavily influence performance on MCUs [14], we implement a targeted Neural Architecture Search (NAS) to identify efficient structures for the three cascade stages.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Banbury, C. R., Reddi, V. J., Lam, M., Fu, W., Fazel, A., Holleman, J., Huang, X., Hurtado, R., Kanter, D., Lokhmotov, A., et al. Benchmarking tinyml systems: Challenges and direction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.04821 , 2020. · arXiv
  2. Cai, H., Zhu, L., and Han, S. ProxylessNAS: Direct neural architecture search on target task and hardware. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2019. URL https://arxiv.org/pdf/ 1812.00332.pdf .
  3. Capotondi, A., Rusci, M., Fariselli, M., and Benini, L. Cmix-nn: Mixed low-precision cnn library for memoryconstrained edge devices. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs , 67(5):871-875, 2020.
  4. Cheng, H.-P., Zhang, T., Yang, Y., Yan, F., Teague, H., Chen, Y., and Li, H. Msnet: Structural wired neural architecture search for internet of things. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops , pp. 0-0, 2019.
  5. Choi, S., Seo, S., Shin, B., Byun, H., Kersner, M., Kim, B., Kim, D., and Ha, S. Temporal convolution for real-time keyword spotting on mobile devices. CoRR , abs/1904.03814, 2019. URL http://arxiv.org/ abs/1904.03814 . · arXiv
  6. Chowdhery, A., Warden, P., Shlens, J., Howard, A., and Rhodes, R. Visual wake words dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.05721 , 2019. · arXiv
  7. David, R., Duke, J., Jain, A., Reddi, V. J., Jeffries, N., Li, J., Kreeger, N., Nappier, I., Natraj, M., Regev, S., et al. Tensorflow lite micro: Embedded machine learning on tinyml systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.08678 , 2020. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banbury, C., Zhou, C., Fedorov, I., Navarro, R. M., Thakker, U., Gope, D., Reddi, V. J., Mattina, M., & Whatmough, P. N.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3094136258
Cited by
183
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 32
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
TinyML, neural architecture search, microcontroller, operation count, inference latency, energy modeling, TensorFlow Lite Micro, Internet of Things, anomaly detection, model compression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review