Cited by 266Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsReinforcement Learning in RoboticsRobot Manipulation and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

VLN↻BERT: A Recurrent Vision-and-Language BERT for Navigation

Hong, Yicong, Wu, Qi, Qi, Yuankai, Rodriguez-Opazo, Cristian, Gould, Stephen·2021·2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Accuracy of many visiolinguistic tasks has benefited significantly from the application of vision-and-language (V&L) BERT. However, its application for the task of vision-and-language navigation (VLN) remains limited. One reason for this is the difficulty adapting the BERT architecture to the partially observable Markov decision process present in VLN, requiring history-dependent attention and decision making. In this paper we propose a recurrent BERT model that is time-aware for use in VLN. Specifically, we equip the BERT model with a recurrent function that maintains cross-modal state information for the agent. Through extensive experiments on R2R and REVERIE we demonstrate that our model can replace more complex encoder-decoder models to achieve state-of-the-art results. Moreover, our approach can be generalised to other transformer-based architectures, supports pre-training, and is capable of solving navigation and referring expression tasks simultaneously.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00169

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. loshchilov, 2018, Decoupled weight de-cay regularization, International Conference on Learning Representations
  2. aliakbarian, 2018, Viena2: A driving anticipation dataset, Asian Conference on Computer Vision, 449

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–266 of 266

Metadata

Authors
Hong, Y., Wu, Q., Qi, Y., Rodriguez-Opazo, C., & Gould, S.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Australian Centre for Robotic Vision (AU)
Venue
2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-06
Pages
1643-1653
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3172675210
Cited by
264
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 6
FWCI
12.92
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
Keywords
vision-and-language navigation, partially observable Markov decision processes, pre-training, transformer models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review