Cited by 19Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

Informative and Consistent Correspondence Mining for Cross-Domain Weakly Supervised Object Detection

Hou, Luwei, Zhang, Yu, Fu, Kui, Li, Jia·2021·2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Cross-domain weakly supervised object detection aims to adapt object-level knowledge from a fully labeled source domain dataset (i.e., with object bounding boxes) to train object detectors for target domains that are weakly labeled (i.e., with image-level tags). Instead of domain-level distribution matching, as popularly adopted in the literature, we propose to learn pixel-wise cross-domain correspondences for more precise knowledge transfer. It is realized through a novel cross-domain co-attention scheme trained as region competition. In this scheme, the cross-domain correspondence module seeks for informative features on the target domain image, which if warped to the source domain image, could best explain its annotations. Meanwhile, a collaborative mask generator competes to mask out the relevant target image region to make the remaining features uninformative. Such competitive learning strives to correlate the full foreground in cross-domain image pairs, revealing the accurate object extent in target domain. To alleviate the ambiguity of inter-domain correspondence learning, a domain-cycle consistency regularizer is further proposed to leverage the more reliable intra-domain correspondence. The proposed approach achieves consistent improvements over existing approaches by a considerable margin, demonstrated by the experiments on various datasets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00980

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To obtain domain-invariant feature representation, feature regularization and adversarial training based methods have been explored at the image, category, or object levels.

    “To obtain domain-invariant feature representation, feature regularization and adversarial training based methods have been explored at the image, category, or object levels [216-221].”

    From Object Detection in 20 Years: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [218]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hou, L., Zhang, Y., Fu, K., & Li, J.
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Virtual Reality Technology and Systems (CN)
  • Sensetime (China) (CN)
  • Peng Cheng Laboratory (CN)
Venue
2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-06
Pages
9924-9933
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3176920308
Cited by
19
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.85
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
co-attention, regional competition, knowledge transfer, image-level labels, domain adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review