Cited by 45Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMachine Learning and AlgorithmsMachine Learning and Data Classification

Self-Supervised Wasserstein Pseudo-Labeling for Semi-Supervised Image Classification

Taherkhani, Fariborz, Dabouei, Ali, Soleymani, Sobhan, Dawson, Jeremy, Nasrabadi, Nasser M.·2021·2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

The goal is to use Wasserstein metric to provide pseudo labels for the unlabeled images to train a Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) in a Semi-Supervised Learning (SSL) manner for the classification task. The basic premise in our method is that the discrepancy between two discrete empirical measures (e.g., clusters) which come from the same or similar distribution is expected to be less than the case where these measures come from completely two different distributions. In our proposed method, we first pre-train our CNN using a self-supervised learning method to make a cluster assumption on the unlabeled images. Next, inspired by the Wasserstein metric which considers the geometry of the metric space to provide a natural notion of similarity between discrete empirical measures, we leverage it to cluster the unlabeled images and then match the clusters to their similar class of labeled images to provide a pseudo label for the data within each cluster. We have evaluated and compared our method with state-of-the-art SSL methods on the standard datasets to demonstrate its effectiveness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01209

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Automating data curation is necessary to cut manual input, and fewer labels should be needed for good performance.

    “The data curation process must be automated to reduce manual input, and the number of labels required for good performance must be reduced [57].”

    From Self-supervised learning: A succinct review (2023) · cites this paper as [57]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taherkhani, F., Dabouei, A., Soleymani, S., Dawson, J., & Nasrabadi, N. M.
Affiliations
West Virginia University (US)
Venue
2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-06
Pages
12262-12272
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3181871665
Cited by
45
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3
FWCI
4.39
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
semi-supervised image classification, pseudo-labeling, Wasserstein distance, self-supervised learning, unlabeled data, cluster matching, distribution discrepancy, convolutional neural networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review