Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposure
Open accessAbstract
It is important to detect anomalous inputs when deploying machine learning systems. The use of larger and more complex inputs in deep learning magnifies the difficulty of distinguishing between anomalous and in-distribution examples. At the same time, diverse image and text data are available in enormous quantities. We propose leveraging these data to improve deep anomaly detection by training anomaly detectors against an auxiliary dataset of outliers, an approach we call Outlier Exposure (OE). This enables anomaly detectors to generalize and detect unseen anomalies. In extensive experiments on natural language processing and small- and large-scale vision tasks, we find that Outlier Exposure significantly improves detection performance. We also observe that cutting-edge generative models trained on CIFAR-10 may assign higher likelihoods to SVHN images than to CIFAR-10 images; we use OE to mitigate this issue. We also analyze the flexibility and robustness of Outlier Exposure, and identify characteristics of the auxiliary dataset that improve performance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Few-shot outlier exposure has first been proposed by [Hendrycks et al., 2018].
“Exposing the OOD detector to a few examples of the out-distribution has first been proposed by [Hendrycks et al., 2018].”
From Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (2022) · cites this paper as Hendrycks et al., 2018
Cites
Zagoruyko, S., & Komodakis, N. (2016) · Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2016 · doi:10.5244/c.30.87 · Cited by 7,244 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges
Abdar, M., Pourpanah, F., Hussain, S., Rezazadegan, D., Liu, L., Ghavamzadeh, M., Fieguth, P., Cao, X., Khosravi, A., Acharya, U. R., et al. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.05.008 · Cited by 2,720 · see citing works
“Daxberger et al. [135] tried to detect OoD samples during test phase.”
BackgroundInfluentialMVTec AD — A Comprehensive Real-World Dataset for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection
Bergmann, P., Fauser, M., Sattlegger, D., & Steger, C. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00982 · Cited by 2,203 · see citing works
CutPaste: Self-Supervised Learning for Anomaly Detection and Localization
Li, C.-L., Sohn, K., Yoon, J., & Pfister, T. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00954 · Cited by 1,107 · see citing works
Bergmann, P., Batzner, K., Fauser, M., Sattlegger, D., & Steger, C. (2021) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-020-01400-4 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
Generalized ODIN: Detecting Out-of-Distribution Image Without Learning From Out-of-Distribution Data
Hsu, Y.-C., Shen, Y., Jin, H., & Kira, Z. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01096 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Bai, Y., Jones, A., Ndousse, K., Askell, A., Chen, A., DasSarma, N., Drain, D., Fort, S., Ganguli, D., Henighan, T., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.05862 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Sub-Image Anomaly Detection with Deep Pyramid Correspondences
Cohen, N., & Hoshen, Y. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.02357 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding
Hendrycks, D., Burns, C., Basart, S., Zou, A., Mazeika, M., Song, D., & Steinhardt, J. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.03300 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Self-citationAttention Guided Anomaly Localization in Images
Venkataramanan, S., Peng, K.-C., Singh, R. V., & Mahalanobis, A. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58520-4_29 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Failing Loudly: An Empirical Study of Methods for Detecting Dataset Shift
Rabanser, S., Günnemann, S., & Lipton, Z. C. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.11953 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Catching Both Gray and Black Swans: Open-set Supervised Anomaly Detection
Ding, C., Pang, G., & Shen, C. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00724 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know
Kadavath, S., Conerly, T., Askell, A., Henighan, T., Drain, D., Perez, E., Schiefer, N., Hatfield-Dodds, Z., DasSarma, N., Tran-Johnson, E., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.05221 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Self-Supervised Video Forensics by Audio-Visual Anomaly Detection
Feng, C., Chen, Z., & Owens, A. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01011 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
“Other work addresses goals similar to anomaly detection by creating methods that model uncertainty [64] or that leverage outlier exposure [30, 44, 88].”
BackgroundMix-n-match: Ensemble and compositional methods for uncertainty calibration in deep learning
Zhang, J., Kailkhura, B., & Han, Y.-J. (2020) · Unpublished · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.11390.13125 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Guha Roy, A., Ren, J., Azizi, S., Loh, A., Natarajan, V., Mustafa, B., Pawlowski, N., Freyberg, J., Liu, Y., Beaver, Z., et al. (2022) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.102274 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Trinh, H. D., Fernandez Gambin, A., Giupponi, L., Rossi, M., & Dini, P. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2020.3028197 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-Supervised Wasserstein Pseudo-Labeling for Semi-Supervised Image Classification
Taherkhani, F., Dabouei, A., Soleymani, S., Dawson, J., & Nasrabadi, N. M. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01209 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Transfer Learning Gaussian Anomaly Detection by Fine-tuning Representations
Rippel, O., Chavan, A., Lei, C., & Merhof, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Image Processing and Vision Engineering · doi:10.5220/0011063900003209 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Image Anomaly Detection with Capsule Networks and Imbalanced Datasets
Piciarelli, C., Mishra, P., & Foresti, G. L. (2019) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30642-7_23 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Toward Scalable and Unified Example-Based Explanation and Outlier Detection
Chong, P., Cheung, N.-M., Elovici, Y., & Binder, A. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2021.3127847 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hendrycks, D., Mazeika, M., & Dietterich, T.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago (US)
- University of Wyoming (US)
- ORCID
- Dietterich, Thomas
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1812.04606
- OpenAlex
- W2904981516
- Cited by
- 932
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 145 · 2023: 185 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 245 · 2020: 125 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 7
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
- Keywords
- deep anomaly detection, outlier exposure, anomaly detection, generative models, likelihood estimation, CIFAR-10, SVHN, robustness, natural language processing, computer vision
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
