Cited by 159Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

PiCIE: Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation using Invariance and Equivariance in Clustering

Open access
Hyun Cho, Jang, Mall, Utkarsh, Bala, Kavita, Hariharan, Bharath·2021·2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

We present a new framework for semantic segmentation without annotations via clustering. Off-the-shelf clustering methods are limited to curated, single-label, and objectcentric images yet real-world data are dominantly uncurated, multi-label, and scene-centric. We extend clustering from images to pixels and assign separate cluster membership to different instances within each image. However, solely relying on pixel-wise feature similarity fails to learn high-level semantic concepts and overfits to lowlevel visual cues. We propose a method to incorporate geometric consistency as an inductive bias to learn invariance and equivariance for photometric and geometric variations. With our novel learning objective, our framework can learn high-level semantic concepts. Our method, PiCIE (Pixel-level feature Clustering using Invariance and Equivariance), is the first method capable of segmenting both things and stuff categories without any hyperparameter tuning or task-specific pre-processing. Our method largely outperforms existing baselines on COCO [31] and Cityscapes [8] with +17.5 Acc. and +4.5 mIoU. We show that PiCIE gives a better initialization for standard supervised training. The code is available at https://github.com/janghyuncho/PiCIE.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01652

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some USS methods utilize supervised prior knowledge, making it difficult to evaluate these methods.

    “2) Due to the lack of clear problem definition and standardized evaluation, some methods utilize supervised prior knowledge, e.g., supervised pre-trained network weights [46], supervised edge detection [30], and supervised saliency detection [31], [47], [48], making it difficult to evaluate these methods.”

    From Large-Scale Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation (2023) · cites this paper as [46]

    The citation to PiCIE is attached specifically to the example of supervised edge detection. In S3. Analysis (p. 14), the paper says it lacks supervision for precise boundaries and discusses using an edge detector only as possible future work, outside the project’s scope. It does not report using supervised edge detection. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [6][6] Xu Ji, Jo˜ ao F Henriques, and Andrea Vedaldi. Invariant information clustering for unsupervised image classification and segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 9865-9874, 2019. 4321, 4322 -
  2. [7][7] Jeff Johnson, Matthijs Douze, and Herv´ e J´ egou. Billionscale similarity search with gpus. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08734 , 2017. 4322 - · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hyun Cho, J., Mall, U., Bala, K., & Hariharan, B.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Venue
2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-06
Pages
16789-16799
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3148215308
Cited by
159
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 3
FWCI
9.67
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
unsupervised semantic segmentation, clustering, invariance, equivariance, geometric consistency, inductive bias, multi-label segmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review