Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 580

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation

Open access
Yang, Lihe, Qi, Lei, Feng, Litong, Zhang, Wayne, Shi, Yinghuan·2023·2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

In this work, we revisit the weak-to-strong consistency framework, popularized by FixMatch from semi-supervised classification, where the prediction of a weakly perturbed image serves as supervision for its strongly perturbed version. Intriguingly, we observe that such a simple pipeline already achieves competitive results against recent advanced works, when transferred to our segmentation scenario. Its success heavily relies on the manual design of strong data augmentations, however, which may be limited and inadequate to explore a broader perturbation space. Motivated by this, we propose an auxiliary feature perturbation stream as a supplement, leading to an expanded perturbation space. On the other, to sufficiently probe original image-level augmentations, we present a dual-stream perturbation technique, enabling two strong views to be simultaneously guided by a common weak view. Consequently, our overall Unified Dual-Stream Perturbations approach (UniMatch) surpasses all existing methods significantly across all evaluation protocols on the Pascal, Cityscapes, and COCO benchmarks. Its superiority is also demonstrated in remote sensing interpretation and medical image analysis. We hope our reproduced FixMatch and our results can inspire more future works.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00699

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. tang, 2021, Humble teachers teach better students for semi -superviscd object detection, CVPR
  2. liu, 2021, Unbiased teacher for semi-supervised object detection, ICLRE
  3. bandara, 2022, Revis-iting consistency regularization for semi -supervised change detection in remote sensing images
  4. berthelot, 2019, Mixmatch: A holistic approach to semi-supervised learning, NeurIPS
  5. berthelot, 2020, Remix-match: Semi-supervised learning with distribution alignment and augmentation anchoring, ICLRE
  6. lee, 0, Pseudo-label: The simple and efficient semi-supervised learning method for deep neural networks, ICML Workshop
  7. xu, 2022, Cross-model pseudo-labeling for semi -superviscd action recognition, CVPR
  8. xie, 2020, Self-training with noisy student improves image net clas-sification, CVPR
  9. grandvalet, 2005, Semi-supervised learning by entropy minimization, NeurIPS
  10. xu, 2022, Semi-supervised semantic segmentation with prototype-based consistency regularization, NeurIPS
  11. hu, 2021, Semi-supervised semantic segmentation via adaptive equalization learning, NeurIPS
  12. wang, 2022, Freematch Self-adaptive thresholding for semi-supervised learning

Cited by

See all 580

Metadata

Authors
Yang, L., Qi, L., Feng, L., Zhang, W., & Shi, Y.
Venue
2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-06
Pages
7236-7246
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386075981
Cited by
580
References
70
FWCI
109.64
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
green
Funders
NSFC (62222604,62206052,62192783)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00699
The paper
Yang, L., Qi, L., Feng, L., Zhang, W., & Shi, Y. (2023). Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation. 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00699

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.