Notice of Removal: VideoFusion: Decomposed Diffusion Models for High-Quality Video Generation
Abstract
A diffusion probabilistic model (DPM), which constructs a forward diffusion process by gradually adding noise to data points and learns the reverse denoising process to generate new samples, has been shown to handle complex data distribution. Despite its recent success in image synthesis, applying DPMs to video generation is still challenging due to high-dimensional data spaces. Previous methods usually adopt a standard diffusion process, where frames in the same video clip are destroyed with independent noises, ignoring the content redundancy and temporal correlation. This work presents a decomposed diffusion process via resolving the per-frame noise into a base noise that is shared among all frames and a residual noise that varies along the time axis. The denoising pipeline employs two jointly-learned networks to match the noise decomposition accordingly. Experiments on various datasets confirm that our approach, termed as VideoFusion, surpasses both GAN-based and diffusion-based alternatives in high-quality video generation. We further show that our decomposed formulation can benefit from pre-trained image diffusion models and well-support text-conditioned video creation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
VideoFusion has achieved the best FVD score on the unconditional Tai-Chi-HD and Sky Time-lapse benchmarks, as well as the best KVD score on TaiChi-HD.
“VideoFusion (Luo et al., 2023) has achieved the best FVD score on the unconditional Tai-Chi-HD and Sky Time-lapse benchmarks, as well as the best KVD score on TaiChi-HD.”
From Video Diffusion Models: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as Luo et al., 2023
VideoFusion's noise decomposition approach saves computational resources because a smaller residual generator denoising model can be used to estimate residual noise per frame, while base noise is estimated only once for the entire video.
“This approach saves computational resources since a smaller residual generator denoising model can be used to estimate the residual noise for each frame, whereas the base noise has to be estimated only once for the entire video using a pre-trained image model.”
From Video Diffusion Models: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as Luo et al. (2023)
Cites
High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models
Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., & Ommer, B. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01042 · Cited by 15,880 · see citing works
Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis
Dhariwal, P., & Nichol, A. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.05233 · Cited by 3,362 · see citing works
Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding
Saharia, C., Chan, W., Saxena, S., Li, L., Whang, J., Denton, E., Ghasemipour, S. K. S., Ayan, B. K., Mahdavi, S. S., Lopes, R. G., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.11487 · Cited by 2,528 · see citing works
Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents
Ramesh, A., Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A., Chu, C., & Chen, M. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.06125 · Cited by 2,511 · cited 6× · see citing works
“For intuitive illustration, we use the decoder of DALL-E 2 [24] to generate images conditioned on the same latent embedding.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialClassifier-Free Diffusion Guidance
Ho, J., & Salimans, T. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.12598 · Cited by 1,126 · see citing works
SRDiff: Single image super-resolution with diffusion probabilistic models
Li, H., Yang, Y., Chang, M., Chen, S., Feng, H., Xu, Z., Li, Q., & Chen, Y. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2022.01.029 · Cited by 777 · see citing works
High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models
Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., & Ommer, B. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.10752 · Cited by 737 · see citing works
VideoGPT: Video Generation using VQ-VAE and Transformers
Yan, W., Zhang, Y., Abbeel, P., & Srinivas, A. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.10157 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Self-citationCogVideo: Large-scale Pretraining for Text-to-Video Generation via Transformers
Hong, W., Ding, M., Zheng, W., Liu, X., & Tang, J. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.15868 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Video Diffusion Models: A Survey
Melnik, A., Ljubljanac, M., Lu, C., Yan, Q., Ren, W., & Ritter, H. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.03150 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Luo, Z., Chen, D., Zhang, Y., Huang, Y., Wang, L., Shen, Y., Zhao, D., Zhou, J., & Tan, T.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Alibaba Group (China) (CN)
- Ant Group (China) (CN)
- ORCID
- Venue
- 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2023-06
- Pages
- 10209-10218
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4386065764
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 15.38
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62236010,62276261,61721004,U1803261)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- video generation, diffusion probabilistic models, noise decomposition, temporal correlation, frame redundancy, noise reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review