Cited by 1,466Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsDigital Media Forensic Detection

Instructpix2pix: Learning to follow image editing instructions

Brooks, Tim, Holynski, Aleksander, Efros, Alexei A.·2023·2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

We propose a method for editing images from human instructions: given an input image and a written instruction that tells the model what to do, our model follows these instructions to edit the image. To obtain training data for this problem, we combine the knowledge of two large pretrained models—a language model (GPT-3) and a text-to-image model (Stable Diffusion)—to generate a large dataset of image editing examples. Our conditional diffusion model, InstructPix2Pix, is trained on our generated data, and generalizes to real images and user-written instructions at inference time. Since it performs edits in the forward pass and does not require per-example fine-tuning or inversion, our model edits images quickly, in a matter of seconds. We show compelling editing results for a diverse collection of input images and written instructions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01764

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Crossmodal attention mechanisms learn fine-grained dependencies between textual and visual tokens directly within the LLM's embedding space, enhancing semantic understanding for tasks like image editing.

    “Crossmodal attention mechanisms learn fine-grained dependencies between textual and visual tokens directly within the LLM's embedding space, enhancing semantic understanding for tasks like image editing [570, 909, 102].”

    From A Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as [102]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brooks, T., Holynski, A., & Efros, A. A.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-06
Pages
18392-18402
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386076215
Cited by
1,466
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 380 · 2025: 532 · 2024: 461 · 2023: 93
FWCI
156.78
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Funders
NSF
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
image editing, text-to-image editing, instruction following, conditional diffusion models, GPT-3, Stable Diffusion, synthetic training data generation, image-to-image translation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review