Cited by 61Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMachine Learning and Data Classification

NoisyQuant: Noisy Bias-Enhanced Post-Training Activation Quantization for Vision Transformers

Open access
Liu, Yijiang, Yang, Huanrui, Dong, Zhen, Keutzer, Kurt, Du, Li, Zhang, Shanghang·2023·2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

The complicated architecture and high training cost of vision transformers urge the exploration of post-training quantization. However, the heavy-tailed distribution of vision transformer activations hinders the effectiveness of previous post-training quantization methods, even with advanced quantizer designs. Instead of tuning the quantizer to better fit the complicated activation distribution, this paper proposes NoisyQuant, a quantizer-agnostic enhancement for the post-training activation quantization performance of vision transformers. We make a surprising theoretical discovery that for a given quantizer, adding a fixed Uniform noisy bias to the values being quantized can significantly reduce the quantization error under provable conditions. Building on the theoretical insight, NoisyQuant achieves the first success on actively altering the heavy-tailed activation distribution with additive noisy bias to fit a given quantizer. Extensive experiments show NoisyQuant largely improves the post-training quantization performance of vision transformer with minimal computation overhead. For instance, on linear uniform 6-bit activation quantization, NoisyQuant improves SOTA top-1 accuracy on ImageNet by up to 1.7%, 1.1% and 0.5% for ViT, DeiT, and Swin Transformer respectively, achieving on-par or even higher performance than previous nonlinear, mixed-precision quantization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01946

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NoisyQuant introduces a quantizer-agnostic method that enhances quantization by incorporating a Noisy Bias into input activations prior to quantization.

    “NoisyQuant [55] introduces a quantizer-agnostic method that enhances the quantization process by incorporating a Noisy Bias into the input activations prior to quantization.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., Yang, H., Dong, Z., Keutzer, K., Du, L., & Zhang, S.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing University (CN)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Peking University (CN)
Venue
2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-06
Pages
20321-20330
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386075763
Cited by
60
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5
FWCI
6.42
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFB4400900)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
post-training quantization, activation quantization, vision transformer, quantization error reduction, uniform quantizer, model compression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review