Cited by 184Digital Media Forensic DetectionGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisFace recognition and analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deepfakes Detection with Automatic Face Weighting

Open access
Montserrat, Daniel Mas, Hao, Hanxiang, Yarlagadda, S. K., Baireddy, Sriram, Shao, Ruiting, Horvath, Janos, Bartusiak, Emily, Yang, Justin, Guera, David, Zhu, Fengqing, Delp, Edward J.·2020·2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)

Abstract

Altered and manipulated multimedia is increasingly present and widely distributed via social media platforms. Advanced video manipulation tools enable the generation of highly realistic-looking altered multimedia. While many methods have been presented to detect manipulations, most of them fail when evaluated with data outside of the datasets used in research environments. In order to address this problem, the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC) provides a large dataset of videos containing realistic manipulations and an evaluation system that ensures that methods work quickly and accurately, even when faced with challenging data. In this paper, we introduce a method based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and recurrent neural networks (RNNs) that extracts visual and temporal features from faces present in videos to accurately detect manipulations. The method is evaluated with the DFDC dataset, providing competitive results compared to other techniques.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvprw50498.2020.00342

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. bailey, 2016, Adobe Photoshop A Beginners Guide to Photoshop Lightroom - The 52 Photoshop Lightroom Tricks You Didn’t Know Existed!, 1
  2. barni, 2019, Copy move sourcetarget disambiguation through multi-branch cnns, arXiv preprint arXiv 1912 12640
  3. goodfellow, 2016, Deep Learning
  4. goodfellow, 2014, Generative adversarial nets, Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2672

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–184 of 184

Metadata

Authors
Montserrat, D. M., Hao, H., Yarlagadda, S. K., Baireddy, S., Shao, R., Horvath, J., Bartusiak, E., Yang, J., Guera, D., Zhu, F., & Delp, E. J.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Venue
2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-06
Pages
2851-2859
OpenAlex
W3020392129
Cited by
181
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9
FWCI
7.79
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
deepfake detection, video manipulation, DFDC, convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks, temporal features, visual features, social media misinformation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review