The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CORE: Consistent Representation Learning for Face Forgery Detection
Open accessAbstract
Face manipulation techniques develop rapidly and arouse widespread public concerns. Despite that vanilla convolutional neural networks achieve acceptable performance, they suffer from the overfitting issue. To relieve this issue, there is a trend to introduce some erasing-based augmentations. We find that these methods indeed attempt to implicitly induce more consistent representations for different augmentations via assigning the same label for different augmented images. However, due to the lack of explicit regularization, the consistency between different representations is less satisfactory. Therefore, we constrain the consistency of different representations explicitly and propose a simple yet effective framework, COnsistent REpresentation Learning (CORE). Specifically, we first capture the different representations with different augmentations, then regularize the cosine distance of the representations to enhance the consistency. Extensive experiments (in-dataset and cross-dataset) demonstrate that CORE performs favorably against state-of-the-art face forgery detection methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/niyunsheng/CORE.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Depending on specific modalities, augmentation operations are various, including (i) image modality: Gaussian blur, JPEG compression, random crop [159, 160]; (ii) video modality: temporal dropout, temporal repeat, clip-level blending [161]; (iii) audio modality: band-pass filters, timeand pitch-shifting, RawBoost [151, 154].”
From Deepfake detection across image, video, and audio: a comprehensive survey with empirical evaluation of generalization and robustness (2026) · cites this paper as [159]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
(2008) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · Cited by 33,051
Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutions
Chollet, F. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.195 · Cited by 20,380
EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks
Tan, M., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.11946 · Cited by 17,072
Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning
He, K., Fan, H., Wu, Y., Xie, S., & Girshick, R. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00975 · Cited by 13,347
A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networks
Karras, T., Laine, S., & Aila, T. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00453 · Cited by 11,714
Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localization
Zhou, B., Khosla, A., Lapedriza, A., Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.319 · Cited by 11,428
A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations
Chen, T., Kornblith, S., Norouzi, M., & Hinton, G. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.05709 · Cited by 10,857
Joint Face Detection and Alignment Using Multitask Cascaded Convolutional Networks
Zhang, K., Zhang, Z., Li, Z., & Qiao, Y. (2016) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2016.2603342 · Cited by 6,214
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- zhao, 2021, Multi-attentional deep-fake detection, CVPR
- dufour, 2019, Contributing data to deep-fake detection research, Google AI Blog
Cited by
Sorted by citations
UCF: Uncovering Common Features for Generalizable Deepfake Detection
Yan, Z., Zhang, Y., Fan, Y., & Wu, B. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.02048 · Cited by 241
Transcending Forgery Specificity with Latent Space Augmentation for Generalizable Deepfake Detection
Yan, Z., Luo, Y., Lyu, S., Liu, Q., & Wu, B. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.00858 · Cited by 166
GAN-Generated Faces Detection: A Survey and New Perspectives
Wang, X., Guo, H., Hu, S., Chang, M.-C., & Lyu, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications · doi:10.3233/faia230558 · Cited by 98
DeepfakeBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Deepfake Detection
Yan, Z., Zhang, Y., Yuan, X., Lyu, S., & Wu, B. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.01426 · Cited by 97
“10) CORE [30]: explicitly constrains the consistency of different representations.”
BackgroundA Contemporary Survey on Deepfake Detection: Datasets, Algorithms, and Challenges
Gong, L. Y., & Li, X. J. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13030585 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Ni, Y., Meng, D., Yu, C., Quan, C., Ren, D., & Zhao, Y.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Meituan (China) (CN)
- Venue
- 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2022-06
- Pages
- 12-21
- OpenAlex
- W4292793883
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 8.16
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Keywords
- face forgery detection, face manipulation, representation learning, consistency regularization, overfitting, cross-dataset generalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
