The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CORE: Consistent Representation Learning for Face Forgery Detection
Open accessAbstract
Face manipulation techniques develop rapidly and arouse widespread public concerns. Despite that vanilla convolutional neural networks achieve acceptable performance, they suffer from the overfitting issue. To relieve this issue, there is a trend to introduce some erasing-based augmentations. We find that these methods indeed attempt to implicitly induce more consistent representations for different augmentations via assigning the same label for different augmented images. However, due to the lack of explicit regularization, the consistency between different representations is less satisfactory. Therefore, we constrain the consistency of different representations explicitly and propose a simple yet effective framework, COnsistent REpresentation Learning (CORE). Specifically, we first capture the different representations with different augmentations, then regularize the cosine distance of the representations to enhance the consistency. Extensive experiments (in-dataset and cross-dataset) demonstrate that CORE performs favorably against state-of-the-art face forgery detection methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/niyunsheng/CORE.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Depending on specific modalities, augmentation operations are various, including (i) image modality: Gaussian blur, JPEG compression, random crop [159, 160]; (ii) video modality: temporal dropout, temporal repeat, clip-level blending [161]; (iii) audio modality: band-pass filters, timeand pitch-shifting, RawBoost [151, 154].”
From Deepfake detection across image, video, and audio: a comprehensive survey with empirical evaluation of generalization and robustness (2026) · cites this paper as [159]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
(2008) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · Cited by 33,051
Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutions
Chollet, F. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.195 · Cited by 20,380
EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks
Tan, M., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.11946 · Cited by 17,072
Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning
He, K., Fan, H., Wu, Y., Xie, S., & Girshick, R. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00975 · Cited by 13,347
A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networks
Karras, T., Laine, S., & Aila, T. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00453 · Cited by 11,714
Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localization
Zhou, B., Khosla, A., Lapedriza, A., Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.319 · Cited by 11,428
A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations
Chen, T., Kornblith, S., Norouzi, M., & Hinton, G. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.05709 · Cited by 10,857
Joint Face Detection and Alignment Using Multitask Cascaded Convolutional Networks
Zhang, K., Zhang, Z., Li, Z., & Qiao, Y. (2016) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2016.2603342 · Cited by 6,214
Tarvainen, A., & Valpola, H. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.01780 · Cited by 4,275
Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-parametric Instance Discrimination
Wu, Z., Xiong, Y., Yu, S. X., & Lin, D. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00393 · Cited by 3,664
Random Erasing Data Augmentation
Zhong, Z., Zheng, L., Kang, G., Li, S., & Yang, Y. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i07.7000 · Cited by 3,617
FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Images
Rossler, A., Cozzolino, D., Verdoliva, L., Riess, C., Thies, J., & Niessner, M. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00009 · Cited by 3,314
Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised LearningPreprint
Laine, S., & Aila, T. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.02242 · Cited by 2,398
Rich Models for Steganalysis of Digital Images
Fridrich, J., & Kodovsky, J. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2012.2190402 · Cited by 2,144
MesoNet: a Compact Facial Video Forgery Detection Network
Afchar, D., Nozick, V., Yamagishi, J., & Echizen, I. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS) · doi:10.1109/wifs.2018.8630761 · Cited by 1,872
Celeb-DF: A Large-Scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake Forensics
Li, Y., Yang, X., Sun, P., Qi, H., & Lyu, S. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00327 · Cited by 1,846 · cited 15×
“In particular, our proposed method achieves a 5.708 AUC gain under Celeb-DF dataset.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFace X-Ray for More General Face Forgery Detection
Li, L., Bao, J., Zhang, T., Yang, H., Chen, D., Wen, F., & Guo, B. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00505 · Cited by 1,211
Thinking in Frequency: Face Forgery Detection by Mining Frequency-Aware Clues
Qian, Y., Yin, G., Sheng, L., Chen, Z., & Shao, J. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58610-2_6 · Cited by 1,058
Multi-attentional Deepfake Detection
Zhao, H., Wei, T., Zhou, W., Zhang, W., Chen, D., & Yu, N. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00222 · Cited by 1,019 · cited 2×
“Multi-attention [50] proposes a novel multiattentional network architecture.”
BackgroundWei, Y., Feng, J., Liang, X., Cheng, M., Zhao, Y., & Yan, S. (2017) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.687 · Cited by 897
Self-citationA Deep Learning Approach to Universal Image Manipulation Detection Using a New Convolutional Layer
Bayar, B., & Stamm, M. C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security · doi:10.1145/2909827.2930786 · Cited by 838
Exposing DeepFake Videos By Detecting Face Warping Artifacts
Li, Y., & Lyu, S. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.00656 · Cited by 785
On the Detection of Digital Face Manipulation
Dang, H., Liu, F., Stehouwer, J., Liu, X., & Jain, A. K. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00582 · Cited by 764
FSGAN: Subject Agnostic Face Swapping and Reenactment
Nirkin, Y., Keller, Y., & Hassner, T. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00728 · Cited by 706
Dense Contrastive Learning for Self-Supervised Visual Pre-Training
Wang, X., Zhang, R., Shen, C., Kong, T., & Li, L. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00304 · Cited by 660
Generalizing Face Forgery Detection with High-frequency Features
Luo, Y., Zhang, Y., Yan, J., & Liu, W. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01605 · Cited by 609
Spatial-Phase Shallow Learning: Rethinking Face Forgery Detection in Frequency Domain
Liu, H., Li, X., Zhou, W., Chen, Y., He, Y., Xue, H., Zhang, W., & Yu, N. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00083 · Cited by 600
Fast Face-Swap Using Convolutional Neural Networks
Korshunova, I., Shi, W., Dambre, J., & Theis, L. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.397 · Cited by 501
FakeCatcher: Detection of Synthetic Portrait Videos using Biological Signals
Ciftci, U. A., Demir, I., & Yin, L. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2020.3009287 · Cited by 499
Two-Branch Recurrent Network for Isolating Deepfakes in Videos
Masi, I., Killekar, A., Mascarenhas, R. M., Gurudatt, S. P., & AbdAlmageed, W. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58571-6_39 · Cited by 471
The Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC) Preview Dataset
Dolhansky, B., Howes, R., Pflaum, B., Baram, N., & Ferrer, C. C. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.08854 · Cited by 413
Learning Self-Consistency for Deepfake Detection
Zhao, T., Xu, X., Xu, M., Ding, H., Xiong, Y., & Xia, W. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01475 · Cited by 383
Xie, Z., Lin, Y., Zhang, Z., Cao, Y., Lin, S., & Hu, H. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01641 · Cited by 370
What Makes Fake Images Detectable? Understanding Properties that Generalize
Chai, L., Bau, D., Lim, S.-N., & Isola, P. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58574-7_7 · Cited by 357
Cozzolino, D., Poggi, G., & Verdoliva, L. (2017) · Proceedings of the 5th ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security · doi:10.1145/3082031.3083247 · Cited by 349
Local Relation Learning for Face Forgery Detection
Chen, S., Yao, T., Chen, Y., Ding, S., Li, J., & Ji, R. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i2.16193 · Cited by 334
Distinguishing computer graphics from natural images using convolution neural networks
Rahmouni, N., Nozick, V., Yamagishi, J., & Echizen, I. (2017) · IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/wifs.2017.8267647 · Cited by 333
Exploring Temporal Coherence for More General Video Face Forgery Detection
Zheng, Y., Bao, J., Chen, D., Zeng, M., & Wen, F. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01477 · Cited by 320
Representative Forgery Mining for Fake Face Detection
Wang, C., & Deng, W. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01468 · Cited by 288
Recurrent convolutional structures for audio spoof and video deepfake detection
Chintha, A., Thai, B., Sohrawardi, S. J., Bhatt, K., Hickerson, A., Wright, M., & Ptucha, R. (2020) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2020.2999185 · Cited by 226
Sharp Multiple Instance Learning for DeepFake Video Detection
Li, X., Lang, Y., Chen, Y., Mao, X., He, Y., Wang, S., Xue, H., & Lu, Q. (2020) · ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) · doi:10.1145/3394171.3414034 · Cited by 196
Hu, J., Liao, X., Wang, W., & Qin, Z. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2021.3074259 · Cited by 195
(2020) · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68821-9_38 · Cited by 113
Das, S., Seferbekov, S., Datta, A., Islam, M. S., & Amin, M. R. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW) · doi:10.1109/iccvw54120.2021.00421 · Cited by 107
Training Strategies and Data Augmentations in CNN-based DeepFake Video Detection
Bondi, L., Cannas, E. D., Bestagini, P., & Tubaro, S. (2020) · IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/wifs49906.2020.9360901 · Cited by 95
DeepfakeUCL: Deepfake Detection via Unsupervised Contrastive Learning
Fung, S., Lu, X., Zhang, C., & Li, C. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn52387.2021.9534089 · Cited by 70
Supervised Contrastive Learning for Generalizable and Explainable DeepFakes Detection
Xu, Y., Raja, K., & Pedersen, M. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW) · doi:10.1109/wacvw54805.2022.00044 · Cited by 62 · cited 1×
“There are some recent works [11, 19, 48] introduce contrastive learning into face forgery detection and get a considerable generalization performance.”
BackgroundSohrawardi, S. J., Chintha, A., Thai, B., Seng, S., Hickerson, A., Ptucha, R., & Wright, M. (2019) · ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) · doi:10.1145/3319535.3363269 · Cited by 42
Towards Universal GAN Image Detection
Cozzolino, D., Gragnaniello, D., Poggi, G., & Verdoliva, L. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP) · doi:10.1109/vcip53242.2021.9675329 · Cited by 35
A Face Preprocessing Approach for Improved DeepFake DetectionPreprint
Charitidis, P., Kordopatis-Zilos, G., Papadopoulos, S., & Kompatsiaris, I. Y. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 5
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- zhao, 2021, Multi-attentional deep-fake detection, CVPR
- dufour, 2019, Contributing data to deep-fake detection research, Google AI Blog
Cited by
Sorted by citations
UCF: Uncovering Common Features for Generalizable Deepfake Detection
Yan, Z., Zhang, Y., Fan, Y., & Wu, B. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.02048 · Cited by 241
Transcending Forgery Specificity with Latent Space Augmentation for Generalizable Deepfake Detection
Yan, Z., Luo, Y., Lyu, S., Liu, Q., & Wu, B. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.00858 · Cited by 166
GAN-Generated Faces Detection: A Survey and New Perspectives
Wang, X., Guo, H., Hu, S., Chang, M.-C., & Lyu, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications · doi:10.3233/faia230558 · Cited by 98
DeepfakeBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Deepfake Detection
Yan, Z., Zhang, Y., Yuan, X., Lyu, S., & Wu, B. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.01426 · Cited by 97
“10) CORE [30]: explicitly constrains the consistency of different representations.”
BackgroundA Contemporary Survey on Deepfake Detection: Datasets, Algorithms, and Challenges
Gong, L. Y., & Li, X. J. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13030585 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Ni, Y., Meng, D., Yu, C., Quan, C., Ren, D., & Zhao, Y.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Meituan (China) (CN)
- Venue
- 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2022-06
- Pages
- 12-21
- OpenAlex
- W4292793883
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 8.16
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Keywords
- face forgery detection, face manipulation, representation learning, consistency regularization, overfitting, cross-dataset generalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
