The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
YOLO-Pose: Enhancing YOLO for Multi Person Pose Estimation Using Object Keypoint Similarity Loss
Open accessAbstract
We introduce YOLO-pose, a novel heatmap-free approach for joint detection, and 2D multi-person pose estimation in an image based on the popular YOLO object detection framework. Existing heatmap based two-stage approaches are sub-optimal as they are not end-to-end trainable and training relies on a surrogate L1 loss that is not equivalent to maximizing the evaluation metric, i.e. Object Keypoint Similarity (OKS). Our framework allows us to train the model end-to-end and optimize the OKS metric itself. The proposed model learns to jointly detect bounding boxes for multiple persons and their corresponding 2Dposes in a single forward pass and thus bringing in the best of both top-down and bottom-up approaches. Proposed approach doesn’t require the post- processing of bottom-up approaches to group detected keypoints into a skeleton as each bounding box has an associated pose, resulting in an inherent grouping of the keypoints. Unlike top-down approaches, multiple forward passes are done away with since all persons are localized along with their pose in a single inference. YOLO-pose achieves new state-of-the-art results on COCO validation (90.2% AP50) and test-dev set (90.3% AP50), surpassing all existing bottom-up approaches in a single forward pass without flip test, multi-scale testing, or any other test time augmentation. All experiments and results reported in this paper are without any test time augmentation, unlike traditional approaches that use flip-test and multi-scale testing to boost performance. Our training codes will be madepublicly available at https://github.com/TexasInstruments/edgeai-yolov5 https://github.com/TexasInstruments/edgeai-yolox
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.01497 · Cited by 70,812
Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context
Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., & Zitnick, C. L. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 · Cited by 45,460
Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Dollar, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Hariharan, B., & Belongie, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.106 · Cited by 30,939
He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollar, P., & Girshick, R. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.322 · Cited by 29,137
EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks
Tan, M., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.11946 · Cited by 17,072
YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detection
Bochkovskiy, A., Wang, C.-Y., & Liao, H.-Y. M. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.10934 · Cited by 10,307
Path Aggregation Network for Instance Segmentation
Liu, S., Qi, L., Qin, H., Shi, J., & Jia, J. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00913 · Cited by 10,011
Howard, A., Sandler, M., Chen, B., Wang, W., Chen, L.-C., Tan, M., Chu, G., Vasudevan, V., Zhu, Y., Pang, R., et al. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00140 · Cited by 9,708
Realtime Multi-person 2D Pose Estimation Using Part Affinity Fields
Cao, Z., Simon, T., Wei, S.-E., & Sheikh, Y. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.143 · Cited by 7,539
Cited by
Bolt Loosening Detection Using Key-Point Detection Enhanced by Synthetic Datasets
Lu, Q., Jing, Y., & Zhao, X. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13032020 · Cited by 28
Spacecraft Homography Pose Estimation with Single-Stage Deep Convolutional Neural Network
Chen, S., Yang, W., Wang, W., Mai, J., Liang, J., & Zhang, X. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s24061828 · Cited by 12
Ultralytics YOLO26: Unified Real-Time End-to-End Vision Models
Jocher, G., Qiu, J., Liu, M., Lyu, S., Akyon, F. C., & Kalfaoglu, M. E. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.03748 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Maji, D., Nagori, S., Mathew, M., & Poddar, D.
- Venue
- 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2022-06
- Pages
- 2636-2645
- OpenAlex
- W4292787291
- Cited by
- 533
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 38.92
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: YOLO-Pose: Enhancing YOLO for Multi Person Pose Estimation Using Object Keypoint Similarity Loss. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvprw56347.2022.00297
- The paper
- Maji, D., Nagori, S., Mathew, M., & Poddar, D. (2022). YOLO-Pose: Enhancing YOLO for Multi Person Pose Estimation Using Object Keypoint Similarity Loss. 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvprw56347.2022.00297
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.