Cited by 90Traffic Prediction and Management TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsTime Series Analysis and Forecasting

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

VMRNN: Integrating Vision Mamba and LSTM for Efficient and Accurate Spatiotemporal Forecasting

Open access
Tang, Yujin, Dong, Peijie, Tang, Zhenheng, Chu, Xiaowen, Liang, Junwei·2024·2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)

Abstract

Combining Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) or Vision Transformers(ViTs) with Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) for spatiotemporal forecasting has yielded unparalleled results in predicting temporal and spatial dynamics. However, modeling extensive global information remains a formidable challenge; CNNs are limited by their narrow receptive fields, and ViTs struggle with the intensive computational demands of their attention mechanisms. The emergence of recent Mamba-based architectures has been met with enthusiasm for their exceptional long-sequence modeling capabilities, surpassing established vision models in efficiency and accuracy, which motivates us to develop an innovative architecture tailored for spatiotemporal forecasting. In this paper, we propose the VMRNN cell, a new recurrent unit that integrates the strengths of Vision Mamba blocks with LSTM. We construct a network centered on VMRNN cells to tackle spatiotemporal prediction tasks effectively. Our extensive evaluations show that our proposed approach secures competitive results on a variety of tasks while maintaining a smaller model size. Our code is available at https://github.com/yyyujintang/VMRNN-PyTorch.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvprw63382.2024.00575

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wang, Eidetic 3d lstm: A model for video prediction and beyond

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tang, Y., Dong, P., Tang, Z., Chu, X., & Liang, J.
Affiliations
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Venue
2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2024-06-17
Pages
5663-5673
OpenAlex
W4402916931
Cited by
70
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 1
FWCI
73.44
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
Keywords
spatiotemporal prediction, Vision Mamba, LSTM, long sequence modeling, CNN-LSTM hybrid model, model size reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review