CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 10Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Supporting presentation techniques based on virtual humans in educational virtual worlds

Chittaro, L., Ieronutti, L., Rigutti, S.·2005·2005 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW'05)
DOI 10.1109/cw.2005.86
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Educational virtual worlds (EVWs) allow one to circumvent physical, safety, and cost constraints that often affect real-world training and learning scenarios. Virtual humans can improve the effectiveness of an EVW e.g., by explaining and demonstrating to the user procedural tasks and communicating with learners in a natural way by exploiting both verbal and nonverbal communication. However, choosing how the learning material has to be presented to the learner and how to employ the virtual human is influenced by different factors, ranging from available technology (e.g., bandwidth, graphics hardware, installed software) to learner's profile (e.g., physical and/or cognitive disabilities, spatial abilities, 2D/3D navigation expertise). The system we present in this paper flexibly supports different presentation techniques employing a virtual human into an EVW. The different capabilities of the system are illustrated, motivated and discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cw.2005.86

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of ECAs could improve the accessibility and acceptance of computer-based assistive technologies, compared to graphical user interfaces and voice interfaces, especially for older adults with cognitive impairment.

    “Globally, current results [10, 11, 5, 6, 12] lead to the conclusion that the use of ECAs could improve the accessibility and acceptance of computer-based assistive technologies, compared to graphical user interfaces and voice interfaces, especially for older adults with cognitive impairment.”

    From Usability assessment of interaction management support in LOUISE, an ECA-based user interface for elders with cognitive impairment (2018) · cites this paper as [10]

  • ECAs have advantages over other kinds of interfaces: naturalness, higher levels of attention, easy understanding, believability, higher motivation, and effectiveness.

    “The aforementioned authors have identified the following advantages of ECAs over other kinds of interfaces: naturalness [11, 5, 6], higher levels of attention [10, 11, 5], easy understanding [11, 5], believability [10, 11], higher motivation [10, 12, 13] and effectiveness [10, 11, 5].”

    From Usability assessment of interaction management support in LOUISE, an ECA-based user interface for elders with cognitive impairment (2018) · cites this paper as [10]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1109/CGI.2003.1214453 · DOI
  2. 10.1037/h0041781 · DOI
  3. 10.1145/604045.604053 · DOI
  4. ekman, 1972, Emotion in the human face Guidelines for research and an integration of findings
  5. ponder, 2003, Immersive VR decision training: Telling interactive stories featuring advanced virtual human simulation technologies, Workshop on Virtual Environments, 97
  6. 10.1145/985040.985049 · DOI
  7. 10.1145/604045.604062 · DOI
  8. kizakevich, 1998, Virtual medical trainer: Patient assessment and trauma care simulator, Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, 309
  9. 10.1080/088395199117315 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1145/544862.544922 · DOI
  11. link, 2001, Factors that influence the perception of feedback delivered by a pedagogical agent, Speech Technology, 4, 145, 10.1023/A:1017383528041 · DOI
  12. bandura, 1977, Social Learning Theory
  13. 10.1006/ijhc.1999.0325 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.006 · DOI
  15. van mulken, 1998, The persona effect: How substantial is it?, Proc CHI 98, 56
  16. 10.1145/267658.269943 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/088395199117360 · DOI · Paper page
  18. lester, 1997, The persona effect: Affective impact of animated pedagogical agents, Proc CHI 97, 359, 10.1145/258549.258797 · DOI
  19. 10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.416 · DOI
  20. 10.1017/CBO9781139164603 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.11.007 · DOI
  22. conceic?a?o-runlee, 1998, Constructivist learning theory to web-based course design: An instructional design approach, Annual Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult Continuing and Community Education
  23. 10.1037/11193-000 · DOI
  24. 10.1145/302979.303150 · DOI
  25. 10.1145/989863.989868 · DOI
  26. 10.1207/S1532690XCI1902_02 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1145/1050491.1050502 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00043-3 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/11555261_69 · DOI
  30. bredo, 2000, Reconsidering social constructivism: The relevance of George Herbert Mead's interactionism, Constructivism in Education Opinions and Second Opinions on Controversial Issues
  31. 10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.416 · DOI
  32. 10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.165 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chittaro, L., Ieronutti, L., & Rigutti, S.
Affiliations
University of Udine (IT)
ORCID
Venue
2005 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW'05)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2005
Pages
8 pp.-252
DOI
10.1109/cw.2005.86
OpenAlex
W1982875284
Cited by
10
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.12
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW) (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (University of Udine) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
virtual worlds in education, virtual humans, presentation techniques, adaptive learning support, nonverbal communication, verbal communication, learner profiles, 3D navigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review