Cited by 6Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)IoT and Edge/Fog Computing

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

FedVPS: Federated Learning for Privacy and Security of Internet of Vehicles on Non-IID Data

Hangdong, Kuang, Bo, Mi, Darong, Huang, Zhaoyang, Deng·2023·2023 IEEE 12th Data Driven Control and Learning Systems Conference (DDCLS)

Abstract

The 6th generation of mobile networks (6G) offers many advantages, including fast transmission rates, low delays, and ultra-dense networks. These benefits can solve the communication problems in the Internet of Vehicles (IoV). However, auto-mobiles as IoV terminals generate Non-Independent Identically Distributed (Non-IID) data while driving, making it necessary to introduce distributed machine learning into the IoV as a network that integrates intelligent computing and vehicle networking. To address the Non-IID of local data and the heterogeneity of local models, we propose a heterogeneous Federated Learning scheme in this paper. Based on the distributed architecture (Terminal - Edge device - Cloud) in the IoV, we designed a privacy protection scheme using Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMPC). This ensures that the terminals participating in Federated Learning get accurate calculation results without revealing useful information, thus preserving the privacy of local datasets. The privacy and security of the IoV based on Federated Learning (FedVPS) not only protect the privacy of the terminals but also improve communication efficiency, enabling accurate and efficient distributed machine learning. The aggregation method of Federated Learning is a prototype-based scheme that utilizes the effective information stored in local datasets. In the BIT-Vehicle dataset, FedVPS is not only more robust but also has excellent prediction accuracy. Compared to FedAvg, FedVPS has advantages…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ddcls58216.2023.10166791

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Apple, 2017, Learning with privacy at scale, Apple Machine Learning Journal, 1.8
  2. Sundar, 2019, Privacy should not be a luxury good, The New York Times, 7
  3. Andrew, 2018, federated learning for mobile keyboard prediction, arXiv preprint
  4. Timothy, 2018, Applied federated learning: Improving google keyboard query suggestions, arXiv preprint
  5. Mingqing, 2019, Federated learning of out-of-vocabulary words, arXiv preprint
  6. Swaroop, 2019, Federated learning for emoji prediction in a mobile keyboard, arXiv preprint
  7. Knaan, 2017, Under the hood of the Pixel 2: how AI is super-charging hardware, Google AI
  8. Brouwer, 2019, The federated future is ready for shipping
  9. Xavier, 2016, A roadmap to safer driving through advanced driver assistance systems, Auto Tech Review, 5.7, 20
  10. Hairi, 2016, Current collision mitigation technologies for advanced driver assistance systems-a survey, Perintise Journal, 6.2, 78
  11. Kenneth, 2009, VANET: vehicular applications and inter-networking technologies
  12. 10.1109/TVT.2020.2973651 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Ligeng, 2019, Deep leakage from gradients, Advances in neural information processing systems, 32
  14. 10.1109/SP.2019.00065 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Ivan, 2001, A generalisation, a simplification and some applications of Pailliers probabilistic public-key system
  16. Cynthia, 2014, The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy, Foundations and Trends® in The-oretical Computer Science, 9.3–4, 211
  17. 10.1109/COMPSAC51774.2021.00070 · DOI
  18. Sonal, 2020, Turn signal prediction: A federated learning case study, arXiv preprint
  19. 10.1016/j.vehcom.2021.100396 · DOI
  20. 10.1155/2021/6633332 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9561612 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1109/GLOCOM.2018.8647927 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1145/3133956.3133982 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1145/2810103.2813687 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Nguyen, 2016, Collecting and analyzing data from smart device users with local differential privacy, arXiv preprint
  26. Lingjuan, 2020, Privacy and robustness in fed-erated learning: Attacks and defenses, arXiv preprint
  27. Lichao, 2020, Federated model distillation with noise-free differential privacy, arXiv preprint
  28. Yue, 2022, Fedproto: Federated prototype learning across heterogeneous clients, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hangdong, K., Bo, M., Darong, H., & Zhaoyang, D.
Affiliations
  • Chongqing Jiaotong University (CN)
  • College of Information Science and Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University,Chongqing,P. R. China,400074
  • Anhui University (CN)
Venue
2023 IEEE 12th Data Driven Control and Learning Systems Conference (DDCLS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-05-12
Pages
178-183
OpenAlex
W4383502492
Cited by
6
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.07
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Data Driven Control and Learning Systems Conference (DDCLS) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
federated learning, Internet of Vehicles, non-IID data, privacy preservation, secure multi-party computation, heterogeneous federated learning, model aggregation, 6G, communication efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review