Cited by 12Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies3D IC and TSV technologiesPowder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Study and Application of Nano Copper Sintering Technology in Power Electronics Packaging

Liu, Xu, Zhou, Quan, Zhao, Xu, Koh, Sau Wee, Ye, Huaiyu, Zhang, Guoqi·2021·2021 IEEE 71st Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)

Abstract

Nano-metal sintering has been proven to be a promising die attachment technology for power electronics packaging in the high-end application. Compared with nano silver technology, it is believed that copper-based sintering technology has better cost and performance superiority, and thus has more potential to be utilized in the industry in the future. However, most of the current developed nano copper sintering material and technology shows bad performance with high sintering energy input. In this study, a novel nano-copper based paste has been developed with excellent process ability (sinterable below 280°C for 10 min with low pressure assisted) and good material property (over 40 MPa shear strength), which turns out to be suitable for the state-of-the-art packaging process. Then the material was applied into a SiC power module packaging scenario which shows comparable performance as silver sintering. The whole process only consumed less than 0.5h for each batch, which indicates that the copper sintering technology has great potential for the packaging application in high power situation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ectc32696.2021.00304

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. friedrichs, 2016, The Future of Power Semiconductors: Rugged and High Performing Silicon Carbide Transistors, Bodo's Power

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Liu, X., Zhou, Q., Zhao, X., Koh, S. W., Ye, H., & Zhang, G.
Affiliations
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
  • Chongqing University (CN)
  • Huawei Technologies (China) (CN)
  • Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
Venue
2021 IEEE 71st Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-06
Pages
1928-1932
ISSN
2766-8401 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3190073289
Cited by
12
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.75
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › 3D IC and TSV technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials
Keywords
die attach, power electronics packaging, low-temperature sintering, low-pressure sintering, shear strength, SiC power modules

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review