“Public procurement barriers in promoting market uptake of innovative LED lighting”
Open accessAbstract
Innovations in the lighting sector, such as LED-based light sources, have opened up unprecedented possibilities to both save energy and improve the quality of lighting. There is growing evidence of light's importance for human health, moods, work productivity and quality of life in general; but the uptake of new solutions is still rather slow in society. The public sector can play an important role in opening up markets for innovative new products, lighting solutions and new business models. This paper presents the current status of the public sector's role in facilitating the uptake of innovations in the lighting sector, using Sweden as a case study. The study is based on interviews, case studies and literature reviews. It discusses the role of public procurement for innovation (PPI), analyses technical, institutional and regulatory barriers from the perspectives of different actors and identifies opportunities for action. Our findings suggest that improvement priorities include the closing of knowledge gaps among relevant actors, optimizing the division of responsibilities for decision-taking, avoiding over-interpretation of legal provisions, more effective learning from pilot examples and more innovative thinking in creating service-oriented business models through public-private partnerships.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Examination of potential procurement of lighting as a service has revealed that a web of technical, institutional and regulatory barriers can impede such solutions and that extensive work in change management is required for such procurement to progress.
“Examination of the potential procurement of lighting as a service has revealed that a web of technical, institutional and regulatory barriers can impede such solutions and that extensive work in change management is required in order for such procurement to progress [16].”
From Public procurement of reconditioned furniture and the potential transition to product service systems solutions (2019) · cites this paper as [16]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Öhgren, M., Milios, L., Dalhammar, C., & Lindahl, M. (2019) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.134 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Plepys, A., & Richter, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Venue
- 2016 Electronics Goes Green 2016+ (EGG)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 2016
- Pages
- 1-8
- OpenAlex
- W2583087804
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.16
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- lup.lub.lu.se
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Electronics Goes Green (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- IEEE Conference Proceedings
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public-Private Partnership Projects
- Keywords
- public procurement, LED lighting, innovation adoption, market barriers, energy efficiency, regulatory challenges, institutional barriers, public-private partnerships, service-oriented business models, Sweden
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review