Cited by 14EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesEpilepsy research and treatmentContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Epileptic seizure classification using the NeuroMov database

Maia, Paulo, Hartl, Elisabeth, Vollmar, Christian, Noachtar, Soheyl, Silva Cunha, Joao Paulo·2019·2019 IEEE 6th Portuguese Meeting on Bioengineering (ENBENG)

Abstract

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders, affecting up to 1% of the world population. In cases where epileptics are not responsive to medication, resective surgery has been found to be an effective treatment for seizure freedom or increase in control. For this, epilepsy must be correctly diagnosed. That evaluation is typically performed by VideoEEG monitoring by physicians, a subjective task that can easily be aided by movement quantification and pattern recognition techniques. Regarding their onset location, seizures can be classified as having extratemporal or temporal origin. This contribution contains an analysis of infrared data from 143 seizures from 31 different patients, recorded in the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit of University of Munich, for seizure classification. Regarding classification, using the seizures' duration and the existence of movements of interest, an 86% ± 17% AUC is obtained using 10-fold cross validation and a Support Vector Machine model. Using the video recordings, the region of interest (bed) was first detected with 88% correct detections and 22% overdetections using a threshold-based method, and all beds were rotated to a vertical position for consistency. Lastly, seizures were classified with a Convolutional Neural Network and a Multilayer Perceptron, obtaining a 65% AUC and showing that the model is better at classifying extratemporal seizures, mostly due to class imbalance. The developed approach shows potential for clinical decision support using a non-intrusive and low cost solution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/enbeng.2019.8692465

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maia et al. [157] achieved 65% AUC for classifying epileptic seizures.

    “Maia et al. [157] applied a threshold-based approach to first detect regions of interest (beds) in video data, aligning them vertically for consistency, then utilized Convolutional Neural Networks and Multilayer Perceptrons to classify epileptic seizures, achieving 65% AUC.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maia, P., Hartl, E., Vollmar, C., Noachtar, S., & Silva Cunha, J. P.
Affiliations
  • INESC TEC (PT)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Venue
2019 IEEE 6th Portuguese Meeting on Bioengineering (ENBENG)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-02
Pages
1-4
OpenAlex
W2938634896
Cited by
14
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.88
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Portuguese Meeting on Bioengineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
epileptic seizure classification, video-EEG monitoring, movement quantification, temporal lobe epilepsy, epilepsy surgery, convolutional neural networks, support vector machine, class imbalance, clinical decision support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review