The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Masters of disguise: Super-recognisers' superior memory for concealed unfamiliar faces
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Super-recognizers are being deployed.
“and the deployment of super-recognizers [135,136]”
From Forensic Facial Comparison: Current Status, Limitations, and Future Directions (2021) · cites this paper as [135]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Error Rates in Users of Automatic Face Recognition Software
White, D., Dunn, J. D., Schmid, A. C., & Kemp, R. I. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139827 · Cited by 141
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- 10.1037/0278-7393.3.4.406 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x · DOI
- 10.1080/09658210902976969 · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-898X.5.4.339 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/9781118469538.ch9 · DOI
- 10.1068/p080431 · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-898X.14.2.139 · DOI
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01378 · DOI
- 2017, Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE) (1984) Codes of Practice (Code D)
- 10.1002/acp.3260 · DOI
- 10.1080/17470218.2016.1161059 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.004 · DOI
- davis, 0, Identification from CCTV: Identification from CCTV: Assessing police super-recognisers ability to spot faces in a crowd and susceptibility to change blindness, Applied Cognitive Psychology
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0150036 · DOI
- 10.3758/PBR.16.2.252 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/acp.3170 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.05.003 · DOI
- davis, 2013, I never forget a face, The Psychologist, 26, 726
- 10.3791/53298 · DOI
- 0, LArge Scale Information Exploitation of Forensic Data (LASIE) project (European Commission 7th Framework Programme
- 10.1068/p3027 · DOI
- o'toole, 2012, Comparing face recognition algorithms to humans on challenging tasks, ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 9, 16, 10.1145/2355598.2355599 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Forensic Facial Comparison: Current Status, Limitations, and Future Directions
Bacci, N., Davimes, J. G., Steyn, M., & Briers, N. (2021) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology10121269 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, J. P., & Tamonyte, D.
- Venue
- 2017 Seventh International Conference on Emerging Security Technologies (EST)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-09
- Pages
- 44-49
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review