The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extended Functionality Attacks on IoT Devices: The Case of Smart Lights
Abstract
In this paper we consider the security aspects of Internet of Things (IoT) devices, which bridge the physical and virtual worlds. We propose a new taxonomy of attacks, which classifies them into four broad categories. The most interesting category (which we call functionality extension attacks) uses the designed functionality of the IoT device to achieve a totally different effect. To demonstrate this type of attack, we consider the case of smart lights (whose original functionality is just to control the color and intensity of the lights in a particular room) and show how to use them to achieve unrelated effects. In the first attack, we use smart lights as a covert LIFI communication system to exfiltrate data from a highly secure (or even fully airgapped) office building. We implemented the attack and were able to read the leaked data from a distance of over 100 meters using only cheap and readily available equipment. In another attack, we showed that an attacker can strobe the lights at a frequency which may trigger seizures in people suffering from photosensitive epilepsy (in the same way that rapidly flashing video games can cause such seizures). In our experiments, we have tested both high-end and lower-end smart light systems, ranging from an expensive Philips HUE system to a cheap system manufactured by LimitlessLED. In addition, we consider other weaknesses of the systems we tested, and propose feasible remedies for the problems we found.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
INTERMITTENT STIMULATION BY LIGHT
Hecht, S., & Shlaer, S. (1936) · Journal of General Physiology · doi:10.1085/jgp.19.6.965 · Cited by 209
Cited by
IoT Goes Nuclear: Creating a ZigBee Chain Reaction
Ronen, E., Shamir, A., Weingarten, A.-O., & OFlynn, C. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2017.14 · Cited by 445
Self-citationLightweight Cryptography: A Solution to Secure IoT
Dhanda, S. S., Singh, B., & Jindal, P. (2020) · Wireless Personal Communications · doi:10.1007/s11277-020-07134-3 · Cited by 294
Fear and Logging in the Internet of Things
Wang, Q., Hassan, W. U., Bates, A., & Gunter, C. (2018) · Proceedings 2018 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2018.23282 · Cited by 196
Consumer, Commercial, and Industrial IoT (In)Security: Attack Taxonomy and Case Studies
Xenofontos, C., Zografopoulos, I., Konstantinou, C., Jolfaei, A., Khan, M. K., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2022) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3079916 · Cited by 183
Review of Security and Privacy for the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
Hatzivasilis, G., Soultatos, O., Ioannidis, S., Verikoukis, C., Demetriou, G., & Tsatsoulis, C. (2019) · 2019 15th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS) · doi:10.1109/dcoss.2019.00091 · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Ronen, E., & Shamir, A.
- Venue
- 2016 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-03
- Pages
- 3-12
- OpenAlex
- W2354520588
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.28
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extended Functionality Attacks on IoT Devices: The Case of Smart Lights. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/eurosp.2016.13
- The paper
- Ronen, E., & Shamir, A. (2016). Extended Functionality Attacks on IoT Devices: The Case of Smart Lights. 2016 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P). https://doi.org/10.1109/eurosp.2016.13
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.