Cited by 26Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Decentralizing Digital Identity: Open Challenges for Distributed Ledgers

Dunphy, Paul, Garratt, Luke, Petitcolas, Fabien·2018·2018 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW)

Abstract

Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) has been proposed as a new way to incorporate decentralization into a wide range of digital infrastructures. Applications of DLT to digital identity are increasing in prevalence, with a recent survey reporting that 55% of DLT technologies in development track digital identity. However, while proofs of concept, open source software, and new ideas are readily available, it is still unclear the extent to which DLT can play a role to underpin new forms of digital identity. In this position paper, we situate this fast-moving application domain into the broader challenges faced in digital identity, with the aim to highlight the socio-technical nature of the challenge at hand, and to propose directions for future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/eurospw.2018.00016

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 2017, Global Initiative Against Transnational Organised Crime, The Trouble with Transparency Increased identity fraud in Sweden's digital age
  2. ignacio, 2015, Minding the Identity Gaps
  3. pascual, 2017, Identity Fraud Securing the Connected Life
  4. thomson, 2016, 2016 Thomson Reuters 2016 Know Your Customer Surveys Reveal Escalating Costs and Complexity
  5. 2018, Certificate Transparency
  6. coinbase, 2018, 2017 Centralised Exchanges Are Terrible At Holding Your Money A Timeline of Catastrophes Retrieved

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dunphy, P., Garratt, L., & Petitcolas, F.
Venue
2018 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-04
Pages
75-78
OpenAlex
W2836009382
Cited by
26
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.77
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
digital identity, distributed ledger technology, decentralization (distributed systems), blockchain, socio-technical challenges, identity management, open source software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review