Cited by 29Internet of Things and AIIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingICT in Developing Communities

TinyML in Africa: Opportunities and Challenges

Ooko, Samson Otieno, Muyonga Ogore, Marvin, Nsenga, Jimmy, Zennaro, Marco·2021·2021 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps)

Abstract

The integration of Internet of Things (IoT) and Machine Learning (ML) is driving the emergence of TinyML, a subset of ML for which models are constrained to be executed on low resource embedded devices. Currently, most IoT applications in Africa are based on cloud-centric architecture making it difficult to enjoy ML-driven intelligence due to connectivity, energy, and cost challenges making tinyML an ideal solution to such challenges. This paper presents an introduction to TinyML and discusses its general applications, solutions to concerns on the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the achievement of the sustainable development goals (SDGs), and the Information Technology for Development (ICT4D) TinyML technology requirements. TinyML applications classifications are highlighted with specific examples from Africa. Different challenges for the adoption of tinyML in Africa have also been presented with the opportunities that can arise from such challenges being shown. This paper shows how tinyML has great potential in Africa where the use of Embedded systems and AI is still underexploited.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/gcwkshps52748.2021.9682107

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This can be challenging in certain locations [115], such as in Africa [18], where internet bandwidth may not be sufficient to support quick transmission to the cloud.

    “However, this can be challenging in certain locations [115], such as in Africa [18], where internet bandwidth may not be sufficient to support the quick transmission to the cloud.”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on TinyML (2023) · cites this paper as [18]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ooko, S. O., Muyonga Ogore, M., Nsenga, J., & Zennaro, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Rwanda (RW)
  • University of Rwanda,African Center of Excellence in Internet of Things,Kigali,Rwanda
  • The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) (IT)
Venue
2021 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-12
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W4206988008
Cited by
29
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5
FWCI
4.15
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
Keywords
TinyML, Internet of Things, embedded systems, resource-constrained devices, Africa, ICT for development, Sustainable Development Goals, AI adoption barriers, edge computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review