The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity
Abstract
The paper describes a new theory called a theory of media synchronicity which proposes that a set of five media capabilities are important to group work, and that all tasks are composed of two fundamental communication processes (conveyance and convergence). Communication effectiveness is influenced by matching the media capabilities to the needs of the fundamental communication processes, not aggregate collections of these processes (i.e., tasks) as proposed by media richness theory. The theory also proposes that the relationships between communication processes and media capabilities will vary between established and newly formed groups, and will change over time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Developmental sequence in small groups.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0022100 · Cited by 5,778
The interdisciplinary study of coordination
Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/174666.174668 · Cited by 3,504
Concurrent feedback, confirmation, and the encoding of referents in verbal communication.
Krauss, R. M., & Weinheimer, S. (1966) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0023705 · Cited by 342
Cited by
Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity1
Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M., & Valacich, J. S. (2008) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148857 · Cited by 1,511
Self-citationManaging team interpersonal processes through technology: A task-technology fit perspective.
Maruping, L. M., & Agarwal, R. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.975 · Cited by 417
A Longitudinal Study of Herd Behavior in the Adoption and Continued Use of Technology1
Sun, H. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.4.02 · Cited by 375
O’Leary, M. B., Wilson, J. M., & Metiu, A. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.4.13 · Cited by 191
The Role of Shared Mental Model Development in Understanding Virtual Team Effectiveness
Maynard, M. T., & Gilson, L. L. (2014) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601113475361 · Cited by 143
Automatic coding of dialogue acts in collaboration protocols
Erkens, G., & Janssen, J. (2008) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-008-9052-6 · Cited by 103
Virtual Team Leader Communication: Employee Perception and Organizational Reality
Newman, S. A., Ford, R. C., & Marshall, G. W. (2020) · International Journal of Business Communication · doi:10.1177/2329488419829895 · Cited by 99
Limaj, E., Bernroider, E. W. N., & Choudrie, J. (2016) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.12.003 · Cited by 72
Team Decision Making in Virtual and Face-to-Face Environments
O’Neill, T. A., Hancock, S. E., Zivkov, K., Larson, N. L., & Law, S. J. (2016) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-015-9465-3 · Cited by 54
Structuring group decision making in a web-based environment by using the nominal group technique
Lago, P. P., Beruvides, M. G., Jian, J.-Y., Canto, A. M., Sandoval, A., & Taraban, R. (2007) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2006.11.003 · Cited by 46
Computer‐mediated communication: synchronicity and compensatory effort
Münzer, S., & Borg, A. (2008) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1387 · Cited by 21
Cyberdating: Misinformation and (Dis)trust in Online Interactions
Wang, H., & (Lucian) Lu, X.-A. (2007) · Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline · doi:10.28945/453 · Cited by 21
Influence of Media Capabilities on Trust in the Sharing Economy
Harrison, A., Mirsadikov, A., & Luu, T. (. (2023) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2023.2229118 · Cited by 10
(2004) · TU/e Research Portal · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2003-01-20
- Pages
- 10
- ISSN
- 1530-1605 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1584582210
- Cited by
- 815
- References
- 5
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.