Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 873

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The impact of critical success factors across the stages of enterprise resource planning implementations

Somers, T.M., Nelson, K.·2005·Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Abstract

The paper describes the impact of critical success factors (CSFs) across the stages of enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementations using the responses from 86 organizations that completed or are in the process of completing an ERP implementation. Our results provide advice to management on how best to utilize their limited resources to choose those CSFs that are most likely to have an impact upon the implementation of the ERP system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/hicss.2001.927129

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. kapp, 0, Avoiding the HAL syndrome of ERP implementations, APICS Magazine, 8
  2. sweat, 1999, Painful Lessons, InformationWeek
  3. gunn, 1998, People: The Primary Resource in World Class Manufacturing, CIM Review, 4, 6
  4. wilder, 1998, False Starts Strong Finishes, Information Week, 41
  5. hammer, 1993, Reengineering the Cooperation a Manifesto for Business Revolution
  6. escalle, 1999, Enterprise Resource Planning Technology Note HBS case #9–699–020
  7. feeny, 1998, Core IS Capabilities for Exploiting IT, Sloan Management Review, 39, 9
  8. gill, 1999, Information on Line: ERP: Keep It Simple, Information Week, 87
  9. 10.1287/inte.17.3.34 · doi:10.1287/inte.17.3.34
  10. stedman, 1999, What's Next for ERP?, Computer World, 33, 48
  11. stackpole, 0, Vendor/Customer Partnerships are Vital, ERP Hub
  12. spangenberg, 1999, System Implementation: Key MIS Considerations for an ERP Implementation, Midrange ERP
  13. somers, 2000, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) for the Next Millennium: Development of an Integrative Framework and Implications for Research, Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, 998
  14. slevin, 1986, The Project Implementation Profile: New Tool for Project Managers, Project Management Journal, 17, 57
  15. cameron, 1998, Rapid ERP Implementation—A Contradiction, Management Accounting, 80, 58
  16. crowley, 1999, Training Treadmill-A Rigorous Plan of End-User Education is Critical to Whipping ERP Systems into Shape, PC Week Online
  17. davenport, 1998, Living with ERP, CIO Magazine, 12, 30
  18. davis, 1998, Scooping up Vanilla ERP, Infoworld, 20
  19. appleton, 0, How to Survive ERP, Datamation, 43, 50
  20. bancroft, 1998, Implementing SAP, r13
  21. robinson, 1999, OR & ERP: A Match for the New Millennium?, OR/MS Today, 26, 30
  22. marion, 0, Crackle, Pop - and Crash - Go the Income Statements, Datamation

Cited by

See all 873

Metadata

Authors
Somers, T. M., & Nelson, K.
Venue
Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
Published
2005-08-29
Pages
10
ISSN
1530-1605 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137990236
Cited by
873
References
45
FWCI
73.60
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of critical success factors across the stages of enterprise resource planning implementations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/hicss.2001.927129
The paper
Somers, T. M., & Nelson, K. (2005). The impact of critical success factors across the stages of enterprise resource planning implementations. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2001.927129

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.