CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 102

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The impact of legitimacy-based motives on IS adoption success: An institutional theory perspective

Krell, Katharina, Matook, Sabine, Rohde, Fiona·2016·Information & Management
DOI 10.1016/j.im.2016.02.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.im.2016.02.006

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 99

  1. Abdel-Hamid, 1999, The impact of goals on software project management: an experimental investigation, MIS Q., 23, 531, 10.2307/249488 · DOI
  2. Akkermans, 2002, Vicious and virtuous cycles in ERP implementation: a case study of interrelations between critical success factors, Eur. J. Inf. Syst., 11, 35, 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000418 · DOI
  3. Aladwani, 2002, An integrated performance model of information systems projects, JMIS, 19, 185
  4. Anantatmula, 2008, The role of technology in the project manager performance model, Proj. Manage. J., 39, 34, 10.1002/pmj.20038 · DOI
  5. Baron, 1986, The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 51, 1173, 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bassellier, 2001, Information technology competence of business managers: a definition and research model, JMIS, 17, 159
  7. Benders, 2006, Sticking to standards – technical and other isomorphic pressures in deploying ERP-systems, Inf. Manage., 43, 194, 10.1016/j.im.2005.06.002 · DOI
  8. Bernroider, 2008, IT governance for enterprise resource planning supported by the DeLone–McLean model of information systems success, Inf. Manage., 45, 257, 10.1016/j.im.2007.11.004 · DOI
  9. Biehl, 2007, Success factors for implementing global information systems, CACM, 50, 53, 10.1145/1188913.1188917 · DOI
  10. Bradley, 2006, Information systems success in the context of different corporate cultural types: an empirical investigation, JMIS, 23, 267
  11. Braganza, 2006, Implementing section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley act: recommendations for information systems organizations, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 18, 464
  12. Bunduchi, 2015, When innovation fails: an institutional perspective of the (non)adoption of boundary spanning IT innovation, Inf. Manage., 10.1016/j.im.2015.04.001 · DOI
  13. Burton-Jones, 2009, Minimizing method bias through programmatic research, MIS Q., 33, 445, 10.2307/20650304 · DOI
  14. Burton-Jones, 2013, From use to effective use: a representation theory perspective, Inf. Syst. Res., 24, 632, 10.1287/isre.1120.0444 · DOI
  15. Burton-Jones, 2006, Reconceptualizing system usage: an approach and empirical test, Inf. Syst. Res., 17, 228, 10.1287/isre.1060.0096 · DOI
  16. Byrd, 2000, Measuring the flexibility of information technology infrastructure: exploratory analysis of a construct, JMIS, 17, 167
  17. Caldeira, 2003, Using resource-based theory to interpret the successful adoption and use of information systems and technology in manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises, Eur. J. Inf. Syst., 12, 127, 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000454 · DOI
  18. Cenfetelli, 2009, Interpretation of formative measurement in Information Systems Research, MIS Q., 33, 689, 10.2307/20650323 · DOI
  19. Cho, 2007, The role of industry infrastructure in telehealth innovations: a multi-level analysis of a telestroke program, Eur. J. Inf. Syst., 16, 738, 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000718 · DOI
  20. Couper, 2000, Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches, Public Opin. Q., 64, 464, 10.1086/318641 · DOI
  21. Cragg, 2002, IT alignment and firm performance in small manufacturing firms, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., 11, 109, 10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00007-0 · DOI
  22. Crawford, 2003, Managing soft change projects in the public sector, Int. J. Proj. Manage., 21, 443, 10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00099-6 · DOI
  23. Cusumano, 2007, The changing labyrinth of software pricing, CACM, 50, 19, 10.1145/1272516.1272531 · DOI
  24. Davis, 2009, When users are IT experts too: the effects of joint IT competence and partnership on satisfaction with enterprise-level systems implementation, Eur. J. Inf. Syst., 18, 26, 10.1057/ejis.2009.4 · DOI
  25. DeVaujany, 2014, Applying and theorizing institutional frameworks in IS research: a systematic analysis from 1999 to 2009, Inf. Technol. People, 27, 280, 10.1108/ITP-10-2013-0185 · DOI
  26. Dewar, 1986, The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: an empirical analysis, Manage. Sci., 32, 1422, 10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1422 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Diamantopoulos, 2006, The error term in formative measurement models: interpretation and modeling implications, J. Model. Manage., 1, 7, 10.1108/17465660610667775 · DOI
  28. DiMaggio, 1983, The iron cage revisited – institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, Am. Sociol. Rev., 48, 147, 10.2307/2095101 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Dix, 2005, When to upgrade, Netw. World, 2005
  30. Dvir, 2003, An empirical analysis of the relationship between project planning and project success, Int. J. Proj. Manage., 21, 89, 10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00012-1 · DOI
  31. El-Sawah, 2008, A quantitative model to predict the Egyptian ERP implementation success index, Bus. Process Manage. J., 14, 288, 10.1108/14637150810876643 · DOI
  32. Engwall, 2003, No project is an island: linking projects to history and context, Res. Policy, 32, 789, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00088-4 · DOI
  33. Espinosa, 2006, Global boundaries, task processes and IS project success: a field study, Inf. Technol. People, 19, 345, 10.1108/09593840610718036 · DOI
  34. Feller, 2008, From peer production to productization: a study of socially enabled business exchanges in open source service networks, Inf. Syst. Res., 19, 475, 10.1287/isre.1080.0207 · DOI
  35. Fornell, 1981, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, J. Mark. Res., 18, 39, 10.2307/3151312 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Garcia, 2004, Seven points financial services institutions should know about IT spending for compliance, J. Financ. Regul. Compliance, 12, 330, 10.1108/13581980410810876 · DOI
  37. Georgiou, 2007, When requests become orders – a formative investigation into the impact of a computerized physician order entry system on a pathology laboratory service, Int. J. Med. Inf., 76, 583, 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.04.002 · DOI
  38. Gersick, 1988, Time and transition in work teams: toward a new model of group development, Acad. Manage. J., 31, 9, 10.2307/256496 · DOI
  39. Gholami, 2013, Senior managers’ perception on green information systems (IS) adoption and environmental performance: results from a field survey, Inf. Manage., 50, 431, 10.1016/j.im.2013.01.004 · DOI
  40. Gosain, 2004, Enterprise information systems as objects and carriers of institutional forces: the new iron cage?, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 5, 151
  41. Gregor, 2006, The transformational dimension in the realization of business value from information technology, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., 15, 249, 10.1016/j.jsis.2006.04.001 · DOI
  42. Gwillim, 2005, The politics of post-implementation reviews, Inf. Syst. J., 15, 307, 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00198.x · DOI
  43. Harland, 2007, Barriers to supply chain information integration: SMEs adrift of eLands, J. Oper. Manage., 25, 1234, 10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.004 · DOI
  44. Haworth, 2006, Sarbanes-Oxley: achieving compliance by starting with ISO 17799, Inf. Syst. Manage., 23, 73, 10.1201/1078.10580530/45769.23.1.20061201/91775.9 · DOI
  45. Hoegl, 2003, Team-level antecedents of individuals’ knowledge networks, Decis. Sci., 34, 741, 10.1111/j.1540-5414.2003.02344.x · DOI
  46. Hu, 2007, The role of external and internal influences on information systems security-a neo-institutional perspective, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., 16, 153, 10.1016/j.jsis.2007.05.004 · DOI
  47. Iacovou, 1995, Electronic data interchange and small organizations: adoption and impact of technology, MIS Q., 19, 465, 10.2307/249629 · DOI
  48. Irani, 2000, The propagation of technology management taxonomies for evaluating investments in information systems, JMIS, 17, 161
  49. Jaafari, 2001, Management of risks, uncertainties and opportunities on projects: time for a fundamental shift, Int. J. Proj. Manage., 19, 89, 10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00047-2 · DOI
  50. James, 2007, Focus on climate change will spawn investment in energy an information technology, energy insights predict, Bus. Wire
  51. Klein, 1989, Legitimation in information systems development: a social change perspective, Off. Technol. People, 5, 29, 10.1108/EUM0000000003527 · DOI
  52. Kostova, 1999, Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: the case of the multinational enterprise, Acad. Manage. Rev., 24, 64, 10.5465/amr.1999.1580441 · DOI
  53. Krell, 2009, Competitive advantage from mandatory investments: an empirical study of Australian firms, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., 18, 31, 10.1016/j.jsis.2008.12.001 · DOI
  54. Kydd, 1989, Understanding the information-content in MIS management tools, MIS Q., 13, 277, 10.2307/249002 · DOI
  55. Labuschagne, 2005, Sustainable project life cycle management: the need to integrate life cycles in the manufacturing sector, Int. J. Proj. Manage., 23, 159, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.06.003 · DOI
  56. Lee, 2006, Organizational size and IT innovation adoption: a meta-analysis, Inf. Manage., 43, 975, 10.1016/j.im.2006.09.003 · DOI
  57. Liu, 2008, Adopting organizational virtualization in B2B firms: an empirical study in Singapore, Inf. Manage., 45, 429, 10.1016/j.im.2008.06.005 · DOI
  58. Lu, 2011, What affects information systems development team performance? An exploratory study from the perspective of combined socio-technical theory and coordination theory, CHB, 27, 811
  59. Malhotra, 1998, An assessment of survey research in POM: from constructs to theory, J. Oper. Manage., 16, 407, 10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00021-7 · DOI
  60. Markus, 1987, Power over users: its exercise by system professionals, CACM, 30, 498, 10.1145/214762.214764 · DOI
  61. Martin, 2007, IS project management: size, practices and the project management office, J. Comput. Inf. Syst., 47, 52
  62. Maruping, 2009, A control theory perspective on agile methodology use and changing user requirements, Inf. Syst. Res., 20, 377, 10.1287/isre.1090.0238 · DOI
  63. McDougall, 2006, Eight blunders you should never make, Inf. Week, 1110, 39
  64. Mignerat, 2009, Positioning the institutional perspective in information systems research, J. Inf. Technol., 24, 369, 10.1057/jit.2009.13 · DOI
  65. Mishra, 2007, Antecedents and consequences of Internet use in procurement: an empirical investigation of U.S. manufacturing firms, Inf. Syst. Res., 18, 103, 10.1287/isre.1070.0115 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Mitchell, 2006, Endogenous adaption: the effects of technology position and planning mode on IT-enabled change, Decis. Sci., 37, 325, 10.1111/j.1540-5414.2006.00130.x · DOI
  67. Mohdzain, 2007, A study of subsidiaries’ views of information systems strategic planning in multinational organisations, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., 16, 324, 10.1016/j.jsis.2007.02.003 · DOI
  68. Munns, 1996, The role of project management in achieving project success, Int. J. Proj. Manage., 14, 81, 10.1016/0263-7863(95)00057-7 · DOI
  69. Oliver, 1997, Sustainable competitive advantage: combining institutional and resource-based views, Strateg. Manage. J., 18, 697, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199710)18:9<697::AID-SMJ909>3.0.CO;2-C · DOI · Paper page
  70. Orlikowski, 2001, Technology and institutions: what can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other?, MIS Q., 25, 145, 10.2307/3250927 · DOI
  71. Palmer, 1993, Late adoption of the multidivisional form by large United-States corporations – institutional, political, and economic accounts, Adm. Sci. Q., 38, 100, 10.2307/2393256 · DOI
  72. Petter, 2013, Information systems success: the quest for the independent variables, JMIS, 29, 7
  73. Petter, 2007, Specifying formative constructs in information systems research, MIS Q., 31, 623, 10.2307/25148814 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Philip, 2007, IS strategic planning for operational efficiency, Inf. Syst. Manage., 24, 247, 10.1080/10580530701404504 · DOI
  75. Potoski, 2005, Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities’ environmental performance, J. Policy Anal. Manage., 24, 745, 10.1002/pam.20136 · DOI
  76. Purao, 2012, Investigating failures in large-scale public sector projects with sentiment analysis, e-Serv. J., 8, 84, 10.2979/eservicej.8.2.84 · DOI
  77. Raz, 2001, Use and benefits of tools for project risk management, Int. J. Proj. Manage., 19, 9, 10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00036-8 · DOI
  78. Shehu, 2009, Construction programme management theory and practice: contextual and pragmatic approach, Int. J. Proj. Manage., 27, 703, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.02.005 · DOI
  79. Shenhar, 2001, Project success: a multidimensional strategic concept, Long Range Plann., 34, 699, 10.1016/S0024-6301(01)00097-8 · DOI · Paper page
  80. Soliman, 1998, The role of SAP software in business process re-engineering, Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage., 18, 886, 10.1108/01443579810225504 · DOI
  81. Son, 2007, Organizational buyers’ adoption and use of B2B electronic marketplaces: efficiency- and legitimacy-oriented perspectives, JMIS, 24, 55
  82. Stefanou, 2001, A framework for the ex-ante evaluation of ERP software, Eur. J. Inf. Syst., 10, 204, 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000407 · DOI
  83. Stratman, 2002, Enterprise resource planning (ERP) competence constructs: two-stage multi-item scale development and validation, Decis. Sci., 33, 601, 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2002.tb01658.x · DOI
  84. Tatikonda, 2000, Successful execution of product development projects: balancing firmness and flexibility in the innovation process, J. Oper. Manage., 18, 401, 10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00028-0 · DOI
  85. Tingling, 2002, Mimetic isomorphism and technology evaluation: does imitation transcend judgment?, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 3, 113
  86. Torkzadeh, 2006, Identifying issues in customer relationship management at Merck-Medco, Decis. Support Syst., 42, 1116, 10.1016/j.dss.2005.10.003 · DOI · Paper page
  87. Tsai, 2013, A study of the institutional forces influencing the adoption intention of RFID by suppliers, Inf. Manage., 50, 59, 10.1016/j.im.2012.05.006 · DOI
  88. Tsamenyi, 2006, Changes in accounting and financial information system in a Spanish electricity company: a new institutional theory analysis, Manage. Account. Res., 17, 409, 10.1016/j.mar.2006.02.002 · DOI
  89. Tseng, 2004, Novel approach to multi-functional project team formation, Int. J. Proj. Manage., 22, 147, 10.1016/S0263-7863(03)00058-9 · DOI
  90. Tsiotras, 1996, ISO 9000 as an entry key to TQM: the case of Greek industry, Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage., 13, 64, 10.1108/02656719610114407 · DOI
  91. Umble, 2003, Enterprise resource planning: implementation procedures and critical success factors, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 146, 241, 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00547-7 · DOI · Paper page
  92. Weerakkody, 2009, The diffusion and use of institutional theory: a cross-disciplinary longitudinal literature survey, J. Inf. Technol., 24, 354, 10.1057/jit.2009.16 · DOI
  93. Wernerfelt, 1984, A resource-based view of the firm, Strateg. Manage. J., 5, 171, 10.1002/smj.4250050207 · DOI · Paper page
  94. Wixom, 2001, An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success, MIS Q., 25, 17, 10.2307/3250957 · DOI
  95. Wong, 2009, Institutional pressures and mindful IT management: the case of a container terminal in China, Inf. Manage., 46, 434, 10.1016/j.im.2009.08.004 · DOI
  96. Xia, 2003, Complexity of information systems development projects: conceptualization and measurement development, JMIS, 22, 45
  97. Xue, 2008, Information technology governance in information technology investment decision processes: the impact of investment characteristics, external environment, and internal context, MIS Q., 32, 67, 10.2307/25148829 · DOI
  98. Yetton, 2000, A model of information systems development project performance, Inf. Syst. J., 10, 263, 10.1046/j.1365-2575.2000.00088.x · DOI
  99. Zhao, 2010, Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis, J. Consum. Res., 37, 197, 10.1086/651257 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 102

Metadata

Authors
Krell, K., Matook, S., & Rohde, F.
Venue
Information & Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
53
Issue
6
Pages
683-697
ISSN
0378-7206
DOI
10.1016/j.im.2016.02.006
Cited by
102
References
10
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of legitimacy-based motives on IS adoption success: An institutional theory perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.im.2016.02.006
The paper
Krell, K., Matook, S., & Rohde, F. (2016). The impact of legitimacy-based motives on IS adoption success: An institutional theory perspective. Information & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.02.006