The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tailoring ERP systems: a spectrum of choices and their implications
Abstract
The IS literature distinguishes between custom-built and off-the-shelf software. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) packages are often viewed as off-the-shelf software, because adopters implement them by setting parameters (called configuration), rather traditional programming. Making changes to ERP software code (called modification) is usually strongly discouraged by vendors and implementation consultants. Nevertheless, field research has shown that many companies have had to modify ERP software in various ways to meet essential business needs. This suggests that ERP packages do not fit cleanly into the custom/off-the shelf distinction. The authors describe a portfolio of tailoring options between configuration and modification, with important implications for implementation risk and the difficulty of ERP system upgrades. They discuss the implications of their framework for practitioners and for further research on ERP systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Enterprise resource planning: cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution?
Soh, C., Kien, S. S., & Tay-Yap, J. (2000) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/332051.332070 · Cited by 686
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- swanson, 1989, Maintaining information systems in organizations, John Wiley information systems series
- ferstl, 1998, Grundlagen der Wirtschaftsinformatik - Band 1
- hirt, 0, Maintaining ERP: Rethinking Relational Foundations, MISQ
- holland, 1999, Beyond Enterprise Resource Planning Projects: Innovative Strategies for Competitive Advantage, Proc of the Third European Conference on Information Systems, 288
- 10.1007/978-3-642-97715-2 · DOI
- koh, 0, A Process Theory Approach to ERP Implementation and Impacts: The Case of Revel Asia, Journal of Information Technology Cases and Applications, 2, 4
- 10.1002/smr.4360070603 · doi:10.1002/smr.4360070603
- laudon, 1988, Management information systems: a contemporary perspective, Macmillan Series in Information Systems
- laudon, 1996, Management Information Systems Organization and Technology
- lozinsky, 1998, Enterprise-Wide Software Solutions Integration Strategies and Practices
- 10.2307/249129 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1201/1078/43197.16.3.19990601/31310.2 · DOI · Paper page
- stedman, 2000, Companies skittish about SAP AG's retail application, ComputerWorld, 34, 24
- brown, 1999, ERP Implementation Approaches: Toward a Contingency Framework, Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Information Systems, 411
- brehm, 2000, The Divided Software Life Cycle of ERP Packages, Proceedings of the 1 St Global Information Technology Management (GITM) World Conference, 43
- stedman, 2000, ERP Problems Put Brakes On Volkswagen Parts Shipment, ComputerWorld, 34, 8
- callaghan, 1998, R/3 Ready-to-Run on 400, MIDRANGE Systems, 11, 14
- buckhout, 1999, Making ERP Succeed: Turning Fear Into Promise, Journal of Business Strategy, 17, 60
- bancroft, 1998, Implementing SAP R/3 2nd ed Greenwich
- ackermann, 1999, Developing a sales information system prototype with SAP R/3, Information Management & Consulting, 14, 49
- davenport, 1998, Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system, Harvard Business Review, 76, 121
- 10.1080/07399018508967761 · doi:10.1080/07399018508967761
- markus, 2000, The Enterprise Systems Experience - From Adoption to Success, Framing the domains of IT research Glimpsing the future through the past, 173
- nelson, 1999, Hershey's Biggest Dud Is Its New Computer System, The Wall Street Journal, 1
- seidel, 2000, SAPs Dat a Warehouse wird erwachsen Computer Woche, 17
- scott, 1999, The FoxMeyer Drugs' Bankruptcy: Was it a Failure of ERP?, Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, 223
Cited by
Learning from adopters' experiences with ERP: problems encountered and success achieved
Markus, M. L., Axline, S., Petrie, D., & Tanis, C. (2000) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1080/02683960010008944 · Cited by 748
Self-citationA multi-project model of key factors affecting organizational benefits from enterprise systems
(2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.5555/2017458.2017464 · Cited by 259
A Multi-Project Model of Key Factors Affecting Organizational Benefits from Enterprise Systems1
Seddon, P. B., Calvert, C., & Yang, S. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20721429 · Cited by 211
Metadata
- Authors
- Brehm, L., Heinzl, A., & Markus, M. L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2005-08-29
- Pages
- 9
- ISSN
- 1530-1605 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2143819510
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.04
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tailoring ERP systems: a spectrum of choices and their implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/hicss.2001.927130
- The paper
- Brehm, L., Heinzl, A., & Markus, M. L. (2005). Tailoring ERP systems: a spectrum of choices and their implications. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2001.927130
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.