Learning from adopters' experiences with ERP: problems encountered and success achieved
Abstract
Enterprise resource planning (ERP) packages touch many aspects of a company's internal and external operations. Consequently, successful deployment and use of ERP systems are critical to organizational performance and survival. This paper presents the results of a study of the problems and outcomes in ERP projects which was conducted under the sponsorship of an ERP systems vendor. Two basic research questions were addressed. First, how successful are companies at different points in time in their ERP experiences and how are different measures of success related? (That is, can early success be followed by failure and vice versa?) Second, what problems do ERP adopters encounter as they implement and deploy ERP and how are these problems related to outcomes? The findings showed that the success of ERP systems depends on when it is measured and that success at one point in time may only be loosely related to success at another point in time. Companies experience problems at all phases of the ERP system life cycle and many of the problems experienced in later phases originated earlier but remained unnoticed or uncorrected. These findings suggest that researchers and companies will do well to adopt broad definitions and multiple measures of success and pay particular attention to the early identification and correction of problems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The number and extent of business benefits achieved by each organization in the post-implementation period was influenced by problems and issues remaining at go-live from the previous phases in the ERP life cycle.
“The number and extent of business benefits achieved by each organization in the postimplementation period was influenced by problems and issues remaining at go-live from the previous phases in the ERP life cycle (Markus et al., 2000; Markus & Tanis, 2000).”
From An Explanatory Framework for Achieving Business Benefits from ERP Systems (2012) · cites this paper as Markus & Tanis, 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Enterprise resource planning: An integrative review
Shehab, E. M., Sharp, M. W., Supramaniam, L., & Spedding, T. A. (2004) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/14637150410548056 · Cited by 801 · see citing works
Critical success factors of enterprise resource planning systems implementation success in China
Zhang, L., Lee, M. K. O., Zhang, Z., & Banerjee, P. (2003) · 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the · doi:10.1109/hicss.2003.1174613 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP): a review of the literature
Moon, Y. B. (2007) · International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development · doi:10.1504/ijmed.2007.012679 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Tsai, J.-M., Cheng, M.-J., Tsai, H.-H., Hung, S.-W., & Chen, Y.-L. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.003 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
ERP system implementation in large enterprises—A systematic literature review
Ali, M., & Miller, L. (2017) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-07-2014-0071 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System Implementation: A Case for User Participation
Matende, S., & Ogao, P. (2013) · Procedia Technology · doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.058 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
A framework for addressing the organisational issues of enterprise systems implementation
Ward, J., Hemingway, C., & Daniel, E. (2005) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2005.04.005 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
An Explanatory Framework for Achieving Business Benefits from ERP Systems
La Trobe University, Staehr, L., Shanks, G., The University of Melbourne, Seddon, P., & The University of Melbourne (2012) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00299 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
- Authors
- Markus, M. L., Axline, S., Petrie, D., & Tanis, C.
- Affiliations
- City University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Claremont Graduate University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Information Technology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 245-265
- ISSN
- 0268-3962 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4437
- OpenAlex
- W2003119263
- Cited by
- 748
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 60
- FWCI
- 34.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Information Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Management
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Keywords
- enterprise resource planning, ERP adoption, ERP implementation, organizational performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review