Cited by 748ERP Systems Implementation and ImpactCorporate Governance and ManagementTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

Learning from adopters' experiences with ERP: problems encountered and success achieved

Markus, M Lynne, Axline, Sheryl, Petrie, David, Tanis, Cornelis·2000·Journal of Information Technology

Abstract

Enterprise resource planning (ERP) packages touch many aspects of a company's internal and external operations. Consequently, successful deployment and use of ERP systems are critical to organizational performance and survival. This paper presents the results of a study of the problems and outcomes in ERP projects which was conducted under the sponsorship of an ERP systems vendor. Two basic research questions were addressed. First, how successful are companies at different points in time in their ERP experiences and how are different measures of success related? (That is, can early success be followed by failure and vice versa?) Second, what problems do ERP adopters encounter as they implement and deploy ERP and how are these problems related to outcomes? The findings showed that the success of ERP systems depends on when it is measured and that success at one point in time may only be loosely related to success at another point in time. Companies experience problems at all phases of the ERP system life cycle and many of the problems experienced in later phases originated earlier but remained unnoticed or uncorrected. These findings suggest that researchers and companies will do well to adopt broad definitions and multiple measures of success and pay particular attention to the early identification and correction of problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02683960010008944

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The number and extent of business benefits achieved by each organization in the post-implementation period was influenced by problems and issues remaining at go-live from the previous phases in the ERP life cycle.

    “The number and extent of business benefits achieved by each organization in the postimplementation period was influenced by problems and issues remaining at go-live from the previous phases in the ERP life cycle (Markus et al., 2000; Markus & Tanis, 2000).”

    From An Explanatory Framework for Achieving Business Benefits from ERP Systems (2012) · cites this paper as Markus & Tanis, 2000

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Markus, M. L., Axline, S., Petrie, D., & Tanis, C.
Affiliations
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Claremont Graduate University (US)
Venue
Journal of Information Technology
Published
2000-12
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
245-265
ISSN
  • 0268-3962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4437
OpenAlex
W2003119263
Cited by
748
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 60
FWCI
34.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Information Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
enterprise resource planning, ERP adoption, ERP implementation, organizational performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review