Quantitative Cyber Risk Reduction Estimation Methodology for a Small SCADA Control System
Open accessAbstract
We propose a new methodology for obtaining a quantitative measurement of the risk reduction achieved when a control system is modified with the intent to improve cyber security defense against external attackers. The proposed methodology employs a directed graph called a compromise graph, where the nodes represent stages of a potential attack and the edges represent the expected time-to-compromise for differing attacker skill levels. Time-to-compromise is modeled as a function of known vulnerabilities and attacker skill level. The methodology was used to calculate risk reduction estimates for a specific SCADA system and for a specific set of control system security remedial actions. Despite an 86% reduction in the total number of vulnerabilities, the estimated time-to-compromise was increased only by about 3 to 30% depending on target and attacker skill level.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In ICS and SCADA systems, integrity and availability are highly paramount, while confidentiality is secondary.
“Among the triad, integrity and availability are highly paramount, while confidentiality is secondary for SCADA systems (Cheminod et al., 2013; McQueen et al., 2006).”
From A review of cyber security risk assessment methods for SCADA systems (2016) · cites this paper as McQueen et al., 2006
Only in two papers, McQueen et al. (2006) and Patel and Zaveri (2010), it is explicitly mentioned that the method was applied to a real system.
“Only in two papers, namely McQueen et al. (2006) and Patel and Zaveri (2010), it is explicitly mentioned that the method was applied to a real system.”
From A review of cyber security risk assessment methods for SCADA systems (2016) · cites this paper as McQueen et al. (2006)
Objective data required for effective risk estimation in SCADA systems are rarely available, so research often relies on artificial data.
“The authors of the methods examined point out that data required for the effective estimation of risk are rarely avail-able (Dondossola et al., 2009; McQueen et al., 2006) and, therefore, research often has to rely on artificial data (Luiijf et al., 2009).”
From A review of cyber security risk assessment methods for SCADA systems (2016) · cites this paper as McQueen et al., 2006
Several proposals (Henry and Haimes, 2009; LeMay et al., 2011; McQueen et al., 2006; Patel et al., 2008) perform comparison of risk metrics between different security configurations of a system.
“There are though several proposals (Henry and Haimes, 2009; LeMay et al., 2011; McQueen et al., 2006; Patel et al., 2008), which we mark with regarding risk evaluation in Table 7, where the comparison of risk metrics is performed between differ-ent security configurations of a system.”
From A review of cyber security risk assessment methods for SCADA systems (2016) · cites this paper as McQueen et al., 2006
Cites
Automated generation and analysis of attack graphs
Sheyner, O., Haines, J. W., Jha, S., Lippmann, R. P., & Wing, J. M. (2005) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/secpri.2002.1004377 · Cited by 1,303 · see citing works
Modeling and simulating critical infrastructures and their interdependencies
Rinaldi, S. M. (2004) · Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences/Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.1109/hicss.2004.1265180 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Advanced Techniques for Modeling Terrorism Risk
Major, J. A. (2002) · The Journal of Risk Finance · doi:10.1108/eb022950 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Modeling and quantification of security attributes of software systems
Madan, B. B., Goševa-Popstojanova, K., Vaidyanathan, K., & Trivedi, K. S. (2003) · International Conference on Dependable Systems & Networks/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/dsn.2002.1028941 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Time-to-Compromise Model for Cyber Risk Reduction Estimation
McQueen, M., Boyer, W. F., Flynn, M. A., & Beitel, G. A. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-36584-8_5 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Self-citationModels and tools for quantitative assessment of operational security
Daciér, M., Deswarte, Y., & Kaâniche, M. (1996) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-1-5041-2919-0_15 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Quantitative Assessment of Operational Security: Models and Tools *
Daciér, M., & Deswarte, Y. (1996) · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Hacking Exposed Windows 2000: Network Security Secrets and Solutions
Scambray, J., & McClure, S. (2001) · McGraw-Hill Professional eBooks · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Balanced Scorecard Method For Predicting TheProbability Of A Terrorist Attack
Beitel, G. A., Gertman, D. I., & Plum, M. (2004) · WIT transactions on ecology and the environment · doi:10.2495/risk040531 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationExpected losses, insurability, and benefits from reducing vulnerability to attacks.
Nozick, L. K., Carlson, R. E., & Turnquist, M. A. (2004) · doi:10.2172/918740 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 11 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Manadhata, P. K., & Wing, J. M. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2010.60 · Cited by 639 · see citing works
A review of cyber security risk assessment methods for SCADA systems
Cherdantseva, Y., Burnap, P., Blyth, A., Eden, P., Jones, K., Soulsby, H., & Stoddart, K. (2016) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2015.09.009 · Cited by 606 · see citing works
DAG-based attack and defense modeling: Don’t miss the forest for the attack trees
Kordy, B., Piètre-Cambacédès, L., & Schweitzer, P. (2014) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2014.07.001 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Cyber security risk assessment for SCADA and DCS networks
Ralston, P. A. S., Graham, J. H., & Hieb, J. L. (2007) · ISA Transactions · doi:10.1016/j.isatra.2007.04.003 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Power system reliability evaluation with SCADA cybersecurity considerations
Zhang, Y., Wang, L., Xiang, Y., & Ten, C.-W. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2015.2396994 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Towards a Framework for Cyber Attack Impact Analysis of the Electric Smart Grid
Kundur, D., Feng, X., Liu, S., Zourntos, T., & Butler-Purry, K. L. (2010) · IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm) · doi:10.1109/smartgrid.2010.5622049 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Kordy, B., Mauw, S., Radomirović, S., & Schweitzer, P. (2012) · Journal of Logic and Computation · doi:10.1093/logcom/exs029 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Quantified security is a weak hypothesis: a critical survey of results and assumptions
Verendel, V. (2009) · Proceedings of the 2009 workshop on New security paradigms workshop · doi:10.1145/1719030.1719036 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Cybersecurity for digital manufacturing
Wu, D., Ren, A., Zhang, W., Fan, F., Liu, P., Fu, X., & Terpenny, J. P. (2018) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.03.006 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
A Survey on Cyber Security Threats in IoT-Enabled Maritime Industry
Ashraf, I., Park, Y., Hur, S., Kim, S. W., Alroobaea, R., Zikria, Y. B., & Nosheen, S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2022.3164678 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Chidukwani, A., Zander, S., & Koutsakis, P. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3197899 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Estimating a system's mean time-to-compromise
Leversage, D. J., & Byres, E. J. (2008) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msp.2008.9 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
SCADA communication and security issues
Gao, J., Liu, J., Rajan, B., Nori, R., Fu, B., Xiao, Y., Liang, W. G., & Chen, C. L. P. (2013) · Security and Communication Networks · doi:10.1002/sec.698 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Model-Based Quantitative Network Security Metrics: A Survey
Ramos, A. L., Lazar, M., Filho, R. H., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2745505 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Security Events and Vulnerability Data for Cybersecurity Risk Estimation
Allodi, L., & Massacci, F. (2017) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12864 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Time-Dependent Analysis of Attacks
Arnold, F., Hermanns, H., Pulungan, R., & Stoelinga, M. I. A. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-54792-8_16 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Beyond Attack Trees: Dynamic Security Modeling with Boolean Logic Driven Markov Processes (BDMP)
Piètre-Cambacédès, L., & Bouissou, M. (2010) · European Dependable Computing Conference · doi:10.1109/edcc.2010.32 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Wang, L., Xiang, Y., & Ten, C. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2015.2510626 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
A survey on the usability and practical applications of Graphical Security Models
Hong, J. B., Kim, D. S., Chung, C.-J., & Huang, D. (2017) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2017.09.001 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Quantitative Attack Tree Analysis via Priced Timed Automata
Kumar, R., Ruijters, E., & Stoelinga, M. I. A. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22975-1_11 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Cybersecurity Challenges for Manufacturing Systems 4.0: Assessment of the Business Impact Level
Corallo, A., Lazoi, M., Lezzi, M., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2021.3084687 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Towards A Taxonomy Of Attacks Against Energy Control Systems
Fleury, T., Khurana, H., & Welch, V. (2010) · IFIP International Federation for Information Processing/IFIP · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-88523-0_6 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Ideal Based Cyber Security Technical Metrics for Control Systems
Boyer, W. F., & McQueen, M. (2008) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-89173-4_21 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationWang, W., Cammi, A., Maio, F. D., Lorenzi, S., & Zio, E. (2018) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2018.03.005 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Power System Reliability Analysis With Intrusion Tolerance in SCADA Systems
Zhang, Y., Wang, L., & Xiang, Y. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2015.2439693 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Sequential and Parallel Attack Tree Modelling
Arnold, F., Guck, D., Kumar, R., & Stoelinga, M. I. A. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24249-1_25 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Addressing IT Security for Critical Control Systems
Naedele, M. (2007) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2007.48 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Yuan, S., Reniers, G., & Yang, M. (2024) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2024.110320 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
A Unified Framework for Measuring a Network's Mean Time-to-Compromise
Nzoukou, W., Wang, L., Jajodia, S., & Singhal, A. (2013) · IEEE Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS) · doi:10.1109/srds.2013.30 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
A Novel Risk Assessment Methodology for SCADA Maritime Logistics Environments
Kalogeraki, E.-M., Papastergiou, S., Mouratidis, H., & Polemi, N. (2018) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app8091477 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Henry, M. H., Layer, R. M., Snow, K. Z., & Zaret, D. R. (2009) · IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST) · doi:10.1109/ths.2009.5168093 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
PENET: A practical method and tool for integrated modeling of security attacks and countermeasures
Pudar, S., Manimaran, G., & Liu, C. (2009) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2009.05.007 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Automatic security assessment of critical cyber-infrastructures
Anwar, Z., Shankesi, R., & Campbell, R. H. (2008) · International Conference on Dependable Systems & Networks/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/dsn.2008.4630105 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Busby, J. S., Green, B., & Hutchison, D. (2017) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12681 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Towards Secure Architecture-Based Adaptations
Khakpour, N., Skandylas, C., Nariman, G. S., & Weyns, D. (2019) · International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems (SEAMS) · doi:10.1109/seams.2019.00023 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Wang, W., Maio, F. D., & Zio, E. (2019) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.13382 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Coupled Petri nets for computer network risk analysis
Henry, M. H., Layer, R. M., & Zaret, D. R. (2010) · International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection · doi:10.1016/j.ijcip.2010.05.002 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Lee, C., Yim, H. B., & Seong, P. H. (2017) · Annals of Nuclear Energy · doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2017.11.002 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Eckhart, M., Brenner, B., Ekelhart, A., & Weippl, E. R. (2019) · Journal of Internet Services and Information Security · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Success Likelihood of Ongoing Attacks for Intrusion Detection and Response Systems
Kanoun, W., Cuppens-Boulahia, N., Cuppens, F., Dubus, S., & Martin, A. (2009) · doi:10.1109/cse.2009.233 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Comparing Electronic Battlefields: Using Mean Time-To-Compromise as a Comparative Security Metric
Leversage, D. J., & Byres, E. J. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73986-9_18 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
The Impact of Social Engineering on Industrial Control System Security
Green, B., Prince, D., Busby, J. S., & Hutchison, D. (2015) · doi:10.1145/2808705.2808717 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
A Markov-Based Model for Information Security Risk Assessment in Healthcare MANETs
Das, S., Mukhopadhyay, A., Saha, D., & Sadhukhan, S. K. (2017) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-017-9809-4 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
A Hybrid Methodology to Assess Cyber Resilience of IoT in Energy Management and Connected Sites
Mehmood, A., Epiphaniou, G., Maple, C. R., Ersotelos, N. T., & Wiseman, R. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23218720 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Risk Analysis of Cyber-Physical Systems by GTST-MLD
Maio, F. D., Mascherona, R., & Zio, E. (2019) · IEEE Systems Journal · doi:10.1109/jsyst.2019.2928046 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Modeling the Ripple Effects of IT‐Based Incidents on Interdependent Economic Systems
Ali, J., & Santos, J. R. (2014) · Systems Engineering · doi:10.1002/sys.21293 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Design and Implementation of Self-Protecting systems: A Formal Approach
Skandylas, C., & Khakpour, N. (2020) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2020.09.005 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
A digraph model for risk identification and mangement in SCADA systems
Guan, J., Graham, J. H., & Hieb, J. L. (2011) · Proceedings of 2011 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics · doi:10.1109/isi.2011.5983990 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Ali, J., & Santos, J. R. (2012) · Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium · doi:10.1109/sieds.2012.6215128 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Overview and Recommendations for Cyber Risk Assessment in Nuclear Power Plants
Zhang, F., & Kelly, K. (2022) · Nuclear Technology · doi:10.1080/00295450.2022.2092356 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Jmal, H., Hmida, F. B., Basta, N., Ikram, M., Kâafar, M. A., & Walker, A. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2023.3338965 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Attack modelling and security evaluation based on stochastic activity networks
Sedaghatbaf, A., & Azgomi, M. A. (2013) · Security and Communication Networks · doi:10.1002/sec.774 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Risk mitigation in electric power systems: Where to start?
Alshawish, A., & de Meer, H. (2019) · Energy Informatics · doi:10.1186/s42162-019-0099-6 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Mission-Based Analysis for Assessing Cyber Risk in Critical Infrastructure Systems
Llansó, T., Tally, G. W., Silberglitt, M., & Anderson, T. (2013) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-45330-4_14 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The β-Time-to-Compromise Metric for Practical Cyber Security Risk Estimation
Zieger, A., Freiling, F., & Kossakowski, K.-P. (2018) · International Conference on IT Security Incident Management and IT Forensics (IMF) · doi:10.1109/imf.2018.00017 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Eisentraut, C., Holzer, S., Klioba, K., Křetínský, J., Pin, L., & Wagner, A. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85315-0_13 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Wei, J., & Kundur, D. (2015) · Power systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-45928-7_9 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Ani, U., Watson, J., He, H., Radanliev, P., & Epiphaniou, G. (2024) · Journal of Cyber Security Technology · doi:10.1080/23742917.2024.2421589 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
White, S. C., & Sedigh, S. (2014) · Advances in computers · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800161-5.00001-3 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Managing Mobile Device Security in Critical Infrastructure Sectors
Vorakulpipat, C., Polprasert, C., & Siwamogsatham, S. (2014) · International Conference on Security of Information and Networks (SIN) · doi:10.1145/2659651.2659742 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Breaking the Cyber Kill Chain by Modelling Resource Costs
Haga, K., Meland, P. H., & Sindre, G. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62230-5_6 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
A Digraph Model for Risk Identification and Management in SCADA Systems
Guan, J., Graham, J. H., & Hieb, J. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-404702-0.00004-5 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Extended Dependency Modeling Technique for Cyber Risk Identification in ICS
Rotibi, A. O., Saxena, N., Burnap, P., & Tarter, A. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3263671 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Efficiently computing the likelihoods of cyclically interdependent risk scenarios
Muller, S., Harpes, C., Traon, Y. L., Gombault, S., & Bonnin, J. (2016) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2016.09.008 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Cost-Effectiveness of Security Measures
Pieters, W., Probst, C. W., Lukszo, Z., & Montoya, L. (2013) · Advances in business information systems and analytics book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4983-5.ch009 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
A Survey of Research in Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA)
Smith, S. C. (2014) · doi:10.21236/ada610235 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
QuADTool: Attack-Defense-Tree Synthesis, Analysis and Bridge to Verification
Dorfhuber, F., Eisentraut, C., Klioba, K., & Křetínský, J. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-68416-6_4 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Measurable Control System Security through Ideal Driven Technical Metrics
McQueen, M., Boyer, W. F., McBride, S. M., Farrar, M., & Tudor, Z. (2008) · University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationModelling and Analysis of Release Order of Security Algorithms Using Stochastic Petri Nets
Alsuhibany, S. A., & van Moorsel, A. (2013) · International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES) · doi:10.1109/ares.2013.58 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
A Review on Cyber Risk Management
Okul, Ş., Muratoğlu, O., Aydın, M. A., & Bılge, H. Ş. (2019) · Acta Infologica · doi:10.26650/acin.502589 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Assessing Anomaly-Based Intrusion Detection Configurations for Industrial Control Systems
Gillen, R., Carter, J. M., Craig, C., Johnson, J. A., & Scott, S. L. (2020) · IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM) · doi:10.1109/wowmom49955.2020.00067 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Experimental Investigation in the Impact on Security of the Release Order of Defensive Algorithms
Alsuhibany, S. A., Alonaizi, A., Morisset, C., Smith, C., & van Moorsel, A. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40588-4_22 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Intelligent response system to mitigate the success likelihood of ongoing attacks
Kanoun, W., Cuppens-Boulahia, N., Cuppens, F., Dubus, S., & Martin, A. (2010) · International Conference on Information Assurance and Security (IAS) · doi:10.1109/isias.2010.5604054 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Mapping Automated Cyber Attack Intelligence to Context-Based Impact on System-Level Goals
Burnap, P., Anthi, E., Reineckea, P., Williams, L., Cao, F., Aldmoura, R., & Jones, K. (2024) · Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy · doi:10.3390/jcp4020017 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Prioritize When Patching Everything is Impossible!
Alshawish, A., & de Meer, H. (2019) · Conference on Local Computer Networks · doi:10.1109/lcn44214.2019.8990847 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Gillen, R., & Scott, S. L. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS) · doi:10.1109/icps48405.2020.9274691 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
A pragmatic method for integrated modeling of security attacks and countermeasures
Pudar, S. (2007) · doi:10.31274/rtd-180813-15752 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Risk Assessment Graphs: Utilizing Attack Graphs for Risk AssessmentPreprint
Unger, S., Arzoglou, E., Heinrich, M., Scheuermann, D., & Katzenbeisser, S. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4635434 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
DEFENDING THE SCADA NETWORK CONTROLLING THE ELECTRICAL GRID FROM ADVANCED PERSISTENT THREATS
Lemay, A. (2013) · PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Model-based structural and behavioral cybersecurity risk assessment in system designs
Jungebloud, T., Nguyen, N. H., Kim, D. S., & Zimmermann, A. (2025) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2025.104543 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
A Model-based Time-to-Compromise Estimator to Assess the Security Posture of Vulnerable Networks
Alshawish, A., Spielvogel, K., & de Meer, H. (2019) · International Conference on Networked Systems (NetSys) · doi:10.1109/netsys.2019.8854511 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
A study on optimization of security function for reducing vulnerabilities in SCADA
Kim, S., Eom, J.-H., & Chung, T. (2012) · International Conference on Cyber Security, Cyber Warfare and Digital Forensic (CyberSec) · doi:10.1109/cybersec.2012.6246099 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
A Formal Security Model for Networked Control Systems
Montanari, M., Li, M., Sampigethaya, K., & Campbell, R. H. (2009) · AIAA Infotech@Aerospace Conference · doi:10.2514/6.2009-1877 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
A Proposed Approach For Handling The Tradeoff Between Security, Usability, and Cost
Alsuhibany, S. A. (2019) · doi:10.1109/iccisci.2019.8716447 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Hivre, S. R., Jadhav, S. M., Shahapure, S., Mhatre, S. M., & Kadam, V. J. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Distributed Systems Security (ICBDS) · doi:10.1109/icbds61829.2024.10837349 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Chenine, M. (2013) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Generic Software Risk Management Framework for SCADA System
Elhady, A. M., Elfetouh, A. A., El-Bakry, H. M., & Hassan, A. (2013) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/11946-7762 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Secure Defensive Mechanisms: An Appropriate Categorisation
Alsuhibany, S. A., & Albattah, W. (2015) · IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Data Intensive Systems · doi:10.1109/dsdis.2015.77 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Bardhan, S., & Battou, A. (2021) · IEEE Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) · doi:10.1109/compsac51774.2021.00151 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Architecting Survivable Networks Using SABSA
Shore, M., & Deng, X. (2010) · International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering (CiSE) · doi:10.1109/wicom.2010.5601323 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Security evaluation of data exchange path in infrastructure networks
Fooladi, R., Ahmadian‐Attari, M., & Hajiannejad, B. (2007) · International Power Engineering Conference · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Quantitative analysis of the release order of defensive mechanisms
Alsuhibany, S. A. (2014) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
McQueen, M., Boyer, W. F., Flynn, M. A., & Alessi, S. (2006) · University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas)
Self-citationAutomatic security assessment of control systems for critical cyber-infrastructures
Campbell, R. H., & Anwar, Z. (2008)
A Quantified Model of Security Policies, with an Application for Injection-Attack Prevention
Ray, D. (2016) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)
Use of Service Oriented Architecture for Scada Networks
Beavers, S. H. (2011) · ePublications at Regis University (Regis University)
Comparing Cyber Defense Alternatives Using Rare-Event Simulation Techniques to Compute Network Risk
Krall, A. (2018) · RIT Scholar Works (Rochester Institute of Technology)
Modernization of Manufacturing with Cybersecurity at the Forefront
Mangano, F. E. (2018) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
Defense in Depth: The Basics of Blockade and DelayPreprint
Lohn, A. J. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.00111
- Authors
- McQueen, M. A., Boyer, W. F., Flynn, M. A., & Beitel, G. A.
- Affiliations
- Idaho National Laboratory (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2006
- Pages
- 226-226
- ISSN
- 1530-1605 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2113310679
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 8.56
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.osti.gov
- Locations
- Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (publishedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
- Keywords
- cyber risk reduction, SCADA systems, vulnerability remediation, directed graph modeling, quantitative risk assessment, industrial control systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review