Cited by 4Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionDigitalization, Law, and RegulationInformation and Cyber Security

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why Companies Change Privacy Policies: A Principal-Agent Perspective

Chipidza, Wallace, Leidner, Dorothy, Burleson, Debra·2016·2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS)

Abstract

Companies often update their privacy policies, but it is unclear whether these updates strengthen or weaken user privacy. Using a principal-agent theoretical lens, we analyze over 200 changes to privacy policies of five prominent Internet companies over a period of fifteen years. We find that over time, privacy policy updates are more likely to weaken, rather than strengthen, user privacy on the Internet. Moreover, analysis of pilot data suggests that companies are more likely to update their privacy policies if they experience negative revenue growth over successive financial reporting periods. Since our results show that changes in privacy policies benefit companies at the expense of user privacy, we conclude that the principal-agent problem exists in the information privacy arena.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/hicss.2016.601

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The granular personal data generated by mHealth, and privacy policies that are already too complex to read but that keep getting longer over time, weaken user privacy on the internet.

    “Moreover, the granular personal data generated by mHealth, and privacy policies that are already too complex to read but that keep getting longer over time, weaken user privacy on the internet [118]”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. son, 2008, Internet Users' Information Privacy-Protective Responses: A Taxonomy and a Nomological Model, MIS Quarterly, 503, 10.2307/25148854 · DOI
  2. soltani, 2010, Flash Cookies and Privacy, AAAI Spring Symposium Intelligent Information Privacy Management
  3. smith, 2011, Information Privacy Research: An Interdisciplinary Review, MIS Quarterly, 989, 10.2307/41409970 · DOI · Paper page
  4. tranmer, 2008, Binary logistic regression, Cathie Marsh for Census and Survey Research
  5. culnan, 2009, How Ethics Can Enhance Organizational Privacy: Lessons from the ChoicePoint and TJX Data Breaches, MIS Quarterly, 673, 10.2307/20650322 · DOI
  6. 10.1145/1593254.1593286 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0022-0531(79)90073-5 · DOI
  8. 10.1086/346135 · DOI
  9. campbell, 2003, The Economic Cost of Publicly Announced Information Security Breaches: Empirical Evidence from the Stock Market, Journal of Computer Security, 431, 10.3233/JCS-2003-11308 · DOI
  10. cavusoglu, 2004, The Effect of Internet Security Breach Announcements on Market Value: Capital Market Reactions for Breached Firms and Internet Security Developers, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 70, 10.1080/10864415.2004.11044320 · DOI
  11. carmel, 1999, Global Software Teams Collaborating Across Borders and Time Zones
  12. awad, 2006, The Personalization Privacy Paradox: An Empirical Evaluation of Information Transparency and the Willingness to Be Profiled Online for Personalization, MIS Quarterly, 13, 10.2307/25148715 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.2307/249775 · DOI · Paper page
  14. mcdonald, 2008, The Cost of Reading Privacy Policies, Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society
  15. 10.1007/978-3-540-69305-5_15 · DOI
  16. metcalfe, 1995, Metcalfe's Law - A network becomes more valuable as it reaches more users, 53
  17. 10.1145/2168836.2168841 · DOI
  18. 2013, Exploring the Economics of Personal Data: A Survey of Methodologies for Measuring Monetary Value, OECD Digital Economy Papers
  19. pavlou, 2011, State of the Information Privacy Literature: Where Are We Now and Where Should We Go?, MIS Quarterly, 977, 10.2307/41409969 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Security and Privacy of mHealth Applications: A Scoping Review

    Nurgalieva, L., O'Callaghan, D., & Doherty, G. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2999934 · Cited by 132

    “Moreover, the granular personal data generated by mHealth, and privacy policies that are already too complex to read but that keep getting longer over time, weaken user privacy on the internet [118], an issue that is important to address for digital health interventions.”
    Background

Metadata

Authors
Chipidza, W., Leidner, D., & Burleson, D.
Affiliations
Baylor University (US)
Venue
2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-01
Pages
4849-4858
ISSN
1530-1605 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2293878514
Cited by
4
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (publishedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
Keywords
user privacy, principal-agent problem, data privacy, sales growth, internet companies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review