The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Companies Change Privacy Policies: A Principal-Agent Perspective
Abstract
Companies often update their privacy policies, but it is unclear whether these updates strengthen or weaken user privacy. Using a principal-agent theoretical lens, we analyze over 200 changes to privacy policies of five prominent Internet companies over a period of fifteen years. We find that over time, privacy policy updates are more likely to weaken, rather than strengthen, user privacy on the Internet. Moreover, analysis of pilot data suggests that companies are more likely to update their privacy policies if they experience negative revenue growth over successive financial reporting periods. Since our results show that changes in privacy policies benefit companies at the expense of user privacy, we conclude that the principal-agent problem exists in the information privacy arena.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The granular personal data generated by mHealth, and privacy policies that are already too complex to read but that keep getting longer over time, weaken user privacy on the internet.
“Moreover, the granular personal data generated by mHealth, and privacy policies that are already too complex to read but that keep getting longer over time, weaken user privacy on the internet [118]”
From Security and Privacy of mHealth Applications: A Scoping Review (2020) · cites this paper as [118]
Citations
Cites
Information Privacy Concerns, Procedural Fairness, and Impersonal Trust: An Empirical Investigation
Culnan, M. J., & Armstrong, P. K. (1999) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.10.1.104 · Cited by 1,870
Privacy in the Digital Age: a Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems1
Bélanger, F., & Crossler, R. E. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409971 · Cited by 1,339
Defaults, Framing and Privacy: Why Opting In-Opting Out1
Johnson, E. J., Bellman, S., & Lohse, G. L. (2002) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1023/a:1015044207315 · Cited by 388
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- son, 2008, Internet Users' Information Privacy-Protective Responses: A Taxonomy and a Nomological Model, MIS Quarterly, 503, 10.2307/25148854 · DOI
- soltani, 2010, Flash Cookies and Privacy, AAAI Spring Symposium Intelligent Information Privacy Management
- smith, 2011, Information Privacy Research: An Interdisciplinary Review, MIS Quarterly, 989, 10.2307/41409970 · DOI · Paper page
- tranmer, 2008, Binary logistic regression, Cathie Marsh for Census and Survey Research
- culnan, 2009, How Ethics Can Enhance Organizational Privacy: Lessons from the ChoicePoint and TJX Data Breaches, MIS Quarterly, 673, 10.2307/20650322 · DOI
- 10.1145/1593254.1593286 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-0531(79)90073-5 · DOI
- 10.1086/346135 · DOI
- campbell, 2003, The Economic Cost of Publicly Announced Information Security Breaches: Empirical Evidence from the Stock Market, Journal of Computer Security, 431, 10.3233/JCS-2003-11308 · DOI
- cavusoglu, 2004, The Effect of Internet Security Breach Announcements on Market Value: Capital Market Reactions for Breached Firms and Internet Security Developers, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 70, 10.1080/10864415.2004.11044320 · DOI
- carmel, 1999, Global Software Teams Collaborating Across Borders and Time Zones
- awad, 2006, The Personalization Privacy Paradox: An Empirical Evaluation of Information Transparency and the Willingness to Be Profiled Online for Personalization, MIS Quarterly, 13, 10.2307/25148715 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/249775 · DOI · Paper page
- mcdonald, 2008, The Cost of Reading Privacy Policies, Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society
- 10.1007/978-3-540-69305-5_15 · DOI
- metcalfe, 1995, Metcalfe's Law - A network becomes more valuable as it reaches more users, 53
- 10.1145/2168836.2168841 · DOI
- 2013, Exploring the Economics of Personal Data: A Survey of Methodologies for Measuring Monetary Value, OECD Digital Economy Papers
- pavlou, 2011, State of the Information Privacy Literature: Where Are We Now and Where Should We Go?, MIS Quarterly, 977, 10.2307/41409969 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Security and Privacy of mHealth Applications: A Scoping Review
Nurgalieva, L., O'Callaghan, D., & Doherty, G. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2999934 · Cited by 132
“Moreover, the granular personal data generated by mHealth, and privacy policies that are already too complex to read but that keep getting longer over time, weaken user privacy on the internet [118], an issue that is important to address for digital health interventions.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Chipidza, W., Leidner, D., & Burleson, D.
- Affiliations
- Baylor University (US)
- Venue
- 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-01
- Pages
- 4849-4858
- ISSN
- 1530-1605 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2293878514
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (publishedVersion)
- Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Keywords
- user privacy, principal-agent problem, data privacy, sales growth, internet companies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review