The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Retention-Aware Placement in DRAM (RAPID): Software Methods for Quasi-Non-Volatile DRAM
Abstract
Measurements of an off-the-shelf DRAM chip confirm that different cells retain information for different amounts of time. This result extends to DRAM rows, or pages (retention time of a page is defined as the shortest retention time among its constituent cells). Currently, a single worst-case refresh period is selected based on the page with the shortest retention time. Even with refresh optimized for room temperature, the worst page limits the safe refresh period to no longer than 500 ms. Yet, 99% and 85% of pages have retention times above 3 seconds and 10 seconds, respectively. We propose retention-aware placement in DRAM (RAPID), novel software approaches that can exploit off-the-shelf DRAMs to reduce refresh power to vanishingly small levels approaching non-volatile memory. The key idea is to favor longer-retention pages over shorter-retention pages when allocating DRAM pages. This allows selecting a single refresh period that depends on the shortest-retention page among populated pages, instead of the shortest-retention page overall. We explore three versions of RAPID and observe refresh energy savings of 83%, 93%, and 95%, relative to the best temperature-compensated refresh. RAPID with off-the-shelf DRAM also approaches the energy levels of idealized techniques that require custom DRAM support.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Flipping bits in memory without accessing them: An experimental study of DRAM disturbance errors
Kim, Y., Daly, R., Kim, J., Fallin, C., Lee, J. H., Lee, D., Wilkerson, C., Lai, K., & Mutlu, O. (2014) · 2014 ACM/IEEE 41st International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA) · doi:10.1109/isca.2014.6853210 · Cited by 465
RAIDR: Retention-Aware Intelligent DRAM Refresh
Liu, J., Jaiyen, B., Veras, R., & Mutlu, O. (2012) · ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News · doi:10.1145/2366231.2337161 · Cited by 444
Liu, J., Jaiyen, B., Kim, Y., Wilkerson, C., & Mutlu, O. (2013) · Proceedings of the 40th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture · doi:10.1145/2485922.2485928 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Venkatesan, R. K., Herr, S., & Rotenberg, E.
- Venue
- The Twelfth International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture, 2006.
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2006-03-21
- Pages
- 157-167
- OpenAlex
- W2124608923
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.73
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retention-Aware Placement in DRAM (RAPID): Software Methods for Quasi-Non-Volatile DRAM. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/hpca.2006.1598122
- The paper
- Venkatesan, R. K., Herr, S., & Rotenberg, E. (2006). Retention-Aware Placement in DRAM (RAPID): Software Methods for Quasi-Non-Volatile DRAM. The Twelfth International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1109/hpca.2006.1598122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.