Cited by 24ECG Monitoring and AnalysisCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Arrhythmia Detection - A Machine Learning based Comparative Analysis with MIT-BIH ECG Data

Singh, Vishavpreet, Tewary, Suman, Sardana, Viren, Sardana, H K·2019·2019 IEEE 5th International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT)

Abstract

Cardiovascular arrhythmias are most common cardiac problem in the world. This work while focusing on development of automated detection and classification of arrhythmia using MIT-BIH database compared five machine learning algorithms with three different features. Pre-processing followed by beat detection is applied on one channel to get individual beats having PQRST window. Three features (viz. simple amplitude feature of 300 samples, area feature with non-overlapped sliding window, and area feature with overlapped sliding window) were used for five classifiers used in this study. It was observed that Artificial Neural Network with amplitude features gave best result with 99.59% accuracy which is comparable to state-of-the art methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/i2ct45611.2019.9033665

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The MIT-BIH arrhythmia database classifies ECG signals into five categories: normal, supraventricular ectopic beat, ventricular ectopic beat, unknown beat, and fusion beat.

    “we adopted the ECG dataset from the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database, which classifies the ECG signals into five categories47: normal (N), supraventricular ectopic beat (S), ventricular ectopic beat (V), unknown beat (Q), and fusion beat (F).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, V., Tewary, S., Sardana, V., & Sardana, H. K.
Affiliations
  • Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (IN)
  • Central Scientific Instruments Organisation (IN)
Venue
2019 IEEE 5th International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-03
Pages
1-5
OpenAlex
W3010729040
Cited by
24
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.42
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
arrhythmia detection, arrhythmia classification, MIT-BIH arrhythmia database, electrocardiogram, beat detection, amplitude features, artificial neural networks, classifier comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review