Impact factor penalized by self-citations
Abstract
This paper proposes a new version of impact factor. The proposed version penalizes JCR IF by journal self-citations. The penalized IF was experimented on 26 journals from Thomson Scientific JCR for 2013 and compared with the JCR IF. For these journals rank correlation between penalized IF and JCR IF is equal to 0.63.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
JIF values can be artificially inflated by pressuring authors to reference articles from a particular journal, as journal self-citations are not accounted for in the calculation of classical and five-year JIF.
“JIF values can also be artificially inflated by other means, for example, by pressuring authors to reference articles from particular journal, as journal self-citations are not accounted for in the calculation of classical and five-year JIF [224,225,230].”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [230]
Cites
The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor
Garfield, E. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.1.90 · Cited by 2,770 · see citing works
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
Seglen, P. O. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497 · Cited by 2,447 · see citing works
Pinski, G., & Narin, F. (1976) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/0306-4573(76)90048-0 · Cited by 601 · see citing works
The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation
Falagas, M. E., & Alexiou, V. G. (2008) · Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis · doi:10.1007/s00005-008-0024-5 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor
Zitt, M., & Small, H. G. (2008) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20880 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Journal accused of manipulating impact factor
Smith, R. W. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7079.461d · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Self-citations in six anaesthesia journals and their significance in determining the impact factor
Fassoulaki, A., Paraskeva, A., Papilas, K., & Karabinis, G. (2000) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013418 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Impact factors: uses and abuses
Neuberger, J., & Counsell, C. (2002) · European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1097/00042737-200203000-00001 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Loet Leydesdorff, A., & Bornmann, L. (2010) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21450 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Sombatsompop, N., Markpin, T., & Premkamolnetr, N. (2004) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1023/b:scie.0000027794.98854.f6 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Moed, H. F. (2010) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21424 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Siebelt, M., Siebelt, T., Pilot, P., Bloem, R. M., Bhandari, M., & Poolman, R. W. (2010) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/1471-2474-11-4 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Publishing Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed
Moukaddam, N. J. (2009) · Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment · doi:10.1097/adt.0b013e3181c3e0f1 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: A cross-sectional study
Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F. G., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Manipulating impact factor: an unethical issue or an Editors choice?
Sevinç, A. (2004) · Swiss Medical Weekly · doi:10.4414/smw.2004.10761 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Citing-side normalization of journal impact: A robust variant of the Audience Factor
Zitt, M. (2010) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.004 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
The self-cited rate of scientific journals and the manipulation of their impact factors
Yu, G., & Wang, L. (2007) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1779-8 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Impact Factor Wars: Episode V—The Empire Strikes Back
Brumback, R. A. (2009) · Journal of Child Neurology · doi:10.1177/0883073808331366 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Journal self-citation rates in ecological sciences
Krauß, J. (2007) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1727-7 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Journal weighted impact factor: A proposal
Habibzadeh, F., & Yadollahie, M. (2008) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.02.001 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Campanario, J. M. (2010) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21457 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Publishing Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed
McCambridge, J. (2005) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01044.x · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Casal, G. B. (2004) · Psychology in Spain · Cited by 29 · see citing works
González, L. L., & Campanario, J. M. (2006) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20424 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Developments in Practice XXXIII: A Holistic Approach to Managing IT-based Risk
Smith, H. A., & McKeen, J. D. (2009) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.02541 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Ferrer-Sapena, A., Sánchez-Pérez, E. A., González, L.-M., Peset, F., & Aleixandre‐Benavent, R. (2015) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1741-0 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Romano, N. (2009) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.02505 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Weighted Impact Factor (WIF) for assessing the quality of scientific journalsPreprint
Alguliyev, R. M., Aliguliyev, R. M., & Ismayilova, N. T. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.02783 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationIMPACT FACTOR WEIGHTED BY 5-YEAR IMPACT FACTOR
Аlguliev, R. M., Aliguliyev, R. M., & Ismayilova, N. T. (2015) · Problems of Information Technology · doi:10.25045/jpit.v06.i2.03 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World
Pranckutė, R. (2021) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications9010012 · Cited by 2,696 · see citing works
- Authors
- Alguliyev, R., Aliguliyev, R., & Ismayilova, N.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Information Technology (AZ)
- Venue
- 2016 IEEE 10th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 25
- Pages
- 1-4
- OpenAlex
- W2740241547
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- impact factor, self-citation, journal evaluation, Journal Citation Reports, bibliometric analysis, citation analysis, journal rankings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review