Cited by 14Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

QASiNa: Religious Domain Question Answering Using Sirah Nabawiyah

Open access
Rizqullah, Muhammad Razif, Purwarianti, Ayu, Aji, Alham Fikri·2023·2023 10th International Conference on Advanced Informatics: Concept, Theory and Application (ICAICTA)

Abstract

Nowadays, Question Answering (QA) tasks receive significant research focus, particularly with the development of Large Language Model (LLM) such as Chat GPT [1]. LLM can be applied to various domains, but it contradicts the principles of information transmission when applied to the Islamic domain. In Islam we strictly regulates the sources of information and who can give interpretations or tafseer for that sources [2]. The approach used by LLM to generate answers based on its own interpretation is similar to the concept of tafseer, LLM is neither an Islamic expert nor a human which is not permitted in Islam. Indonesia is the country with the largest Islamic believer population in the world [3]. With the high influence of LLM, we need to make evaluation of LLM in religious domain. Currently, there is only few religious QA dataset available and none of them using Sirah Nabawiyah especially in Indonesian Language. In this paper, we propose the Question Answering Sirah Nabawiyah (QASiNa) dataset, a novel dataset compiled from Sirah Nabawiyah literatures in Indonesian language. We demonstrate our dataset by using mBERT [4], XLM-R [5], and IndoBERT [6] which fine-tuned with Indonesian translation of SQuAD v2.0 [7]. XLM-R model returned the best performance on QASiNa with EM of 61.20, F1-Score of 75.94, and Substring Match of 70.00. We compare XLM-R performance with Chat GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 [1]. Both Chat GPT version returned lower EM and F1-Score with higher Substring Match, the gap of EM and Substring Match get wider in GPT-4. The experiment indicate that Chat GPT tends to give excessive interpretations as evidenced by its higher Substring Match scores compared to EM and F1-Score, even after providing instruction and context. This concludes Chat GPT is unsuitable for question answering task in religious domain especially for Islamic religion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icaicta59291.2023.10390123

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 2023, Chatgpt
  2. 10.15575/al-bayan.v1i2.1596 · DOI
  3. Annur, 2023, Ini jumlah populasi muslim di kawasan asean, indonesia terbanyak
  4. Conneau, 2019, Unsu-pervised cross-lingual representation learning at scale, arXiv preprint
  5. 10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.66 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/ICAICTA49861.2020.9429032 · DOI
  7. 10.15408/idi.v9i2.17542 · DOI
  8. Al-Mubarakfuri, 2012, Sirah nabawiyah
  9. 10.35940/ijrte.b1089.0982s1119 · DOI
  10. 10.3115/v1/W14-3607 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Malhas, 2022, Quran qa 2022: Overview of the first shared task on question answering over the holy qur’ an, 79
  12. 10.1145/3400396 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Alqahtani, 2018, Annotated corpus of arabic al-quran question and answer, Archive of University of Leeds
  14. 10.1109/CITSM.2014.7042185 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/CITSM.2016.7577585 · DOI
  16. 10.1145/3011141.3011219 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.csl.2019.101023 · DOI
  18. NEAMAH, 2017, Question answering system supporting vector machine method for hadith domain, Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 95
  19. 10.47760/ijcsmc.2021.v10i04.017 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/ICCI54321.2022.9756122 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1109/ICT4M.2016.038 · DOI
  22. 10.1037/scp0000078 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/IJCNN.2018.8489756 · DOI
  24. 10.4018/978-1-60566-766-9.ch011 · DOI
  25. 10.3390/app122211522 · DOI
  26. 10.18653/v1/2021.dialdoc-1.9 · DOI
  27. 10.26418/jlk.v4i2.62 · DOI
  28. Bastari, 2013, Kontemplasi politik (belajar dari kisah perang badar menu-rut sirah ibnu hisyam dan al-thabari), Jurnal Tapis: Jurnal Teropong Aspirasi Politik Islam, 9, 16
  29. 10.30868/at.v4i01.428 · DOI
  30. Salahuddin, 2017, Isramiraj studi analisis sejarah dalam pendidikan islam, Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Anak (JIPA), 2
  31. 10.23971/njppi.v4i1.1879 · DOI
  32. 10.36668/jal.v10i1.256 · DOI
  33. 10.15408/quhas.v1i2.1327 · DOI
  34. Fuad, 2014, sejarah peradaban islam
  35. Thabrani, 2014, Tata kelola pemerintahan negara madinah pada masa nabi muhammad saw, RIGHT: Jurnal Agama dan Hak Azazi Manusia, 4
  36. Sairazi, 2019, Kondisi geografis, sosial politik, dan hukum di makkah dan madinah pada masa awal islam, Journal of Islamic and Law Studies, 3, 119
  37. 10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.465 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rizqullah, M. R., Purwarianti, A., & Aji, A. F.
Affiliations
  • Bandung Institute of Technology (ID)
  • Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence (AE)
Venue
2023 10th International Conference on Advanced Informatics: Concept, Theory and Application (ICAICTA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-10-07
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W4390905727
Cited by
14
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3
FWCI
2.22
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Conference on Advanced Informatics: Concepts, Theory and Applications (ICAICTA) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
Sirah Nabawiyah, biography of Muhammad, Indonesian language, large language models, ChatGPT, multilingual pretrained models, XLM-R

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review