Cited by 32Sentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningOnline Learning and Analytics

Sentiment Analysis in an Affective Intelligent Tutoring System

Barron-Estrada, Maria Lucia, Zatarain-Cabada, Ramon, Oramas-Bustillos, Raul, Gonzalez-Hernandez, Francisco·2017·2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)

Abstract

This paper presents an implementation of Sentiment Analysis module that works in an Affective Intelligent Tutoring System. Later, we show the results of evaluating this module and some experiments we made with students. We consider that the main contribution of this work is that with this module, the system will be able to analyze the student's feedback using sentiment analysis techniques and provide useful information to the course administrators teachers for improving the teaching material.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icalt.2017.137

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barron-Estrada, M. L., Zatarain-Cabada, R., Oramas-Bustillos, R., & Gonzalez-Hernandez, F.
Venue
2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-07
Pages
394-397
OpenAlex
W2742658477
Cited by
32
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.50
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Tecnológico Nacional de México
  • Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
Keywords
sentiment analysis, student feedback, student emotions, course management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review