Cited by 842Robot Manipulation and LearningReinforcement Learning in Robotics3D Shape Modeling and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The YCB object and Model set: Towards common benchmarks for manipulation research

Calli, Berk, Singh, Arjun, Walsman, Aaron, Srinivasa, Siddhartha, Abbeel, Pieter, Dollar, Aaron M.·2015·2015 International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR)

Abstract

In this paper we present the Yale-CMU-Berkeley (YCB) Object and Model set, intended to be used for benchmarking in robotic grasping and manipulation research. The objects in the set are designed to cover various aspects of the manipulation problem; it includes objects of daily life with different shapes, sizes, textures, weight and rigidity, as well as some widely used manipulation tests. The associated database provides high-resolution RGBD scans, physical properties and geometric models of the objects for easy incorporation into manipulation and planning software platforms. A comprehensive literature survey on existing benchmarks and object datasets is also presented and their scope and limitations are discussed. The set will be freely distributed to research groups worldwide at a series of tutorials at robotics conferences, and will be otherwise available at a reasonable purchase cost.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icar.2015.7251504

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 31 references

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. richtsfeld, 2012, The Object Segmentation Database (OSD)
  2. 2005, McGill 3D Shape Benchmark
  3. 2014, Sketchup
  4. del pobil, 2006, Benchmarks for Robotics Research
  5. detry, 2014, International Workshop on Autonomous Grasping and Manipulation An Open Challenge

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 842

Metadata

Authors
Calli, B., Singh, A., Walsman, A., Srinivasa, S., Abbeel, P., & Dollar, A. M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Venue
2015 International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2015-07
Pages
510-517
OpenAlex
W1505952289
Cited by
838
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 118 · 2024: 140 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 117 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 1
FWCI
28.96
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Yale University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Keywords
robotic manipulation, robotic grasping, benchmark dataset, object dataset, geometric model, manipulation planning, everyday objects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review