Multi-task deep neural network with shared hidden layers: Breaking down the wall between emotion representations
Open accessAbstract
Emotion representations are psychological constructs for modelling, analysing, and recognising emotion, being one essential element of affect. Due to its complexity, the boundaries between different emotion concepts are often fuzzy, which is also reflected in the diversification of emotion databases, and their inconsistent target labels. When facing data scarcity as an ever present issue for acoustic emotion recognition, the straightforward method to jointly use the existing data resources is to map various emotion labels onto one common dimensional space; this, however, comes with considerable information loss. To solve the dilemma of data aggregation whilst efficiently exploiting the emotion labels in terms of their original meaning and interrelations, we advocate the usage of multi-task deep neural networks with shared hidden layers (MT-SHL-DNN), in which the feature transformations are shared across different emotion representations, while the output layers are separately associated with each emotion database. On nine frequently used emotional speech corpora and two different acoustic feature sets, we demonstrate that the MT-SHL-DNN method outperforms the single-task DNNs trained with only one emotion representation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multiple studies have shown that transfer learning can improve model accuracy by leveraging additional sources of related knowledge.
“Multiple studies have shown that transfer learning can improve model accuracy by leveraging additional sources of related knowledge (e.g., from other paralinguistic tasks [136], various standard databases [137], and different affect representations [135]).”
From Deep learning for human affect recognition: Insights and new developments (2021) · cites this paper as [135]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
What are emotions? And how can they be measured?
Scherer, K. R. (2005) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/0539018405058216 · Cited by 4,264 · see citing works
POSNER, J., RUSSELL, J. A., & PETERSON, B. S. (2005) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579405050340 · Cited by 2,602 · see citing works
The biological affects: a typology.
Buck, R. (1999) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.106.2.301 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep learning for human affect recognition: Insights and new developments
Rouast, P. V., Adam, M. T. P., & Chiong, R. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2018.2890471 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Domain Adversarial for Acoustic Emotion Recognition
Abdelwahab, M., & Busso, C. (2018) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2018.2867099 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Automated emotion recognition: Current trends and future perspectives
Maithri, M., Raghavendra, U., Gudigar, A., Samanth, J., Barua, P. D., Murugappan, M., Chakole, Y., & Acharya, U. R. (2022) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106646 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Weninger, F., & Schuller, B.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- ORCID
- Zhang, Yue
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-03
- Pages
- 4990-4994
- ISSN
- 1520-6149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2680534654
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 9.11
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
- OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
- Keywords
- acoustic emotion recognition, multi-task learning, emotion representation, data scarcity, acoustic features, cross-dataset generalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review