Cited by 76Caching and Content DeliveryImage and Video Quality AssessmentNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control

Dynamic adaptive streaming over CCN: A caching and overhead analysis

Open access
Liu, Yaning, Geurts, Joost, Point, Jean-Charles, Lederer, Stefan, Rainer, Benjamin, Muller, Christopher, Timmerer, Christian, Hellwagner, Hermann·2013·2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC)

Abstract

In this paper, we present our implementation and evaluation of Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over Content centric networking (DASC) which implements MPEG Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP (DASH) utilizing a Content Centric Networking (CCN) naming scheme to identify content segments in a CCN network. In particular, video segments formatted according to MPEG-DASH are available in different quality levels but instead of HTTP, CCN is used for referencing and delivery. Based on the conditions of the network, the DASC client issues interests for segments achieving the best throughput. Due to segment caching within the network, subsequent requests for the same content can be served quicker. As a result, the quality of the video a user receives progressively improves, effectively overcoming bottlenecks in the network. We present two sets of experiments to evaluate the performance of DASC showing that throughput indeed improves. However, the generated overhead is relatively large and the adaptation strategy used for DASH that assumes an end-to-end connection could be revised for the hop-by-hop architecture of CCN.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icc.2013.6655116

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., Geurts, J., Point, J.-C., Lederer, S., Rainer, B., Muller, C., Timmerer, C., & Hellwagner, H.
Affiliations
University of Klagenfurt (AT)
Venue
2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-06
Pages
3629-3633
ISSN
1550-3607 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055858842
Cited by
76
References
15
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI
8.43
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Conference on Communications (publishedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Caching and Content Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Traffic and Congestion Control
Keywords
dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP, content-centric networking, MPEG-DASH, video streaming, network overhead, quality of experience, throughput

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review