The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distributed Anomaly Detection Using Autoencoder Neural Networks in WSN for IoT
Open accessAbstract
Wireless sensor networks (WSN) are fundamental to the Internet of Things (IoT) by bridging the gap between the physical and the cyber worlds. Anomaly detection is a critical task in this context as it is responsible for identifying various events of interests such as equipment faults and undiscovered phenomena. However, this task is challenging because of the elusive nature of anomalies and the volatility of the ambient environments. In a resource-scarce setting like WSN, this challenge is further elevated and weakens the suitability of many existing solutions. In this paper, for the first time, we introduce autoencoder neural networks into WSN to solve the anomaly detection problem. We design a two-part algorithm that resides on sensors and the IoT cloud respectively, such that (i) anomalies can be detected at sensors in a fully distributed manner without the need for communicating with any other sensors or the cloud, and (ii) the relatively more computation-intensive learning task can be handled by the cloud with a much lower (and configurable) frequency. In addition to the minimal communication overhead, the computational load on sensors is also very low (of polynomial complexity) and readily affordable by most COTS sensors. Using a real WSN indoor testbed and sensor data collected over 4 consecutive months, we demonstrate via experiments that our proposed autoencoder-based anomaly detection mechanism achieves high detection accuracy and low false alarm rate. It is also able to adapt to unforeseeable and new changes in a non-stationary environment, thanks to the unsupervised learning feature of our chosen autoencoder neural networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882 · Cited by 11,687
Distributed Real-Time Anomaly Detection in Networked Industrial Sensing Systems
Chen, P.-Y., Yang, S., & McCann, J. A. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2014.2350451 · Cited by 148
Cited by
Deep Learning in Mobile and Wireless Networking: A Survey
Zhang, C., Patras, P., & Haddadi, H. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2904897 · Cited by 1,768
Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Survey
Chalapathy, R., & Chawla, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.03407 · Cited by 1,240
Smart Anomaly Detection in Sensor Systems: A Multi-Perspective Review
Erhan, L., Ndubuaku, M., Di Mauro, M., Song, W., Chen, M., Fortino, G., Bagdasar, O., & Liotta, A. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.10.001 · Cited by 378
Machine Learning-Enabled Internet of Things (IoT): Data, Applications, and Industry Perspective
Bzai, J., Alam, F., Dhafer, A., Bojović, M., Altowaijri, S. M., Niazi, I. K., & Mehmood, R. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11172676 · Cited by 110
Online learning on tiny micro-controllers for anomaly detection in water distribution systems
Pau, D., Khiari, A., & Denaro, D. (2021) · 2021 IEEE 11th International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE-Berlin) · doi:10.1109/icce-berlin53567.2021.9720009 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Luo, T., & Nagarajan, S. G.
- Venue
- 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-05
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 1550-3607 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2887731362
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.45
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distributed Anomaly Detection Using Autoencoder Neural Networks in WSN for IoT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icc.2018.8422402
- The paper
- Luo, T., & Nagarajan, S. G. (2018). Distributed Anomaly Detection Using Autoencoder Neural Networks in WSN for IoT. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). https://doi.org/10.1109/icc.2018.8422402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.